Romo and Game Management

DABOYZ

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,228
Reaction score
416
This question came up on a local radio show. Would Romo have more wins if he learned to manage the game?

Against the Bears we had a situaon where we were down 17-7. if we come away with just 2 field goals the game is well within reach in the 4th. Instead we come away with nothing and lose big.

I know Romo has won us a few games with his Bret Favre mentality but the rest of the leaue has caught on and defenses seem to wait for him to make the crucial mistakes in close games.

Heading into the bye week, is it time for Romo to work on his game management skills and give this team and its playmakers a chance to win a game at the end?
 
maxdallasfan;4767636 said:
It's too late to change his ways.

Understandable, but hope that maybe he has it in him to be a little more careful with the ball.
 
DABOYZ;4767634 said:
This question came up on a local radio show. Would Romo have more wins if he learned to manage the game?

Against the Bears we had a situaon where we were down 17-7. if we come away with just 2 field goals the game is well within reach in the 4th. Instead we come away with nothing and lose big.

I know Romo has won us a few games with his Bret Favre mentality but the rest of the leaue has caught on and defenses seem to wait for him to make the crucial mistakes in close games.

Heading into the bye week, is it time for Romo to work on his game management skills and give this team and its playmakers a chance to win a game at the end?

defenses are not waiting on Romo to make the crucial mistake; they're waiting on the offense to make a mistake. Big difference! And the offense is sure to do that, and it does not mean it's Romo per se. In fact, he's probably lower on the list in mistakes. That's different from bring at the top of the list for shouldering the blame. Now on that lsit he's first.
 
What you see is exactly what Romo is: an aging, but talented QB still playing sandlot football, because in his mind, football is just a game, after all; there are more important things in life, like family and friends. Which is partly true. But there's another unspoken truth, which Romo doesn't seem to have grasped, and that is that playing QB for the Cowboys is not a game, it's a high-paying job. JJ isn't paying Romo to play sandlot football. He's paying Romo to take the Cowboys to the Super Bowl and win it. So, Romo, imo, has yet to understand that life is also all about doing your job to the best of your ability, and not treating it like it's only a game that grownups play on Sundays. And when you don't do your job well in football you're gonna get benched, just like if you don't do your job in real life you're gonna get fired!

I've always thought that Romo lacked the elite QB's passion and respect for the game of football. Say what you will about Rodgers, Eli, Ben, Brady et.al, they all play the game to win, and they fight to the last moment to do so. Romo seems to give up quickly after he struggles, or the team struggles. You can see it in his body language. To make everything worse, a lot of people(fans, coaches and JJ) make excuses for his poor play by blaming the OL, blaming his receivers, or blaming JG for the poor play calling. Even the defense gets blamed for not bailing him out. Only certain media members seemed to be demanding accountability, which is why I thought Galloway's article was spot on for once, and not extreme or prejudicial.

Listen, if you lack that fire-in-the-belly for your job, innate talent will only take you only so far. In Romo's case, his stats scream how talented he is, but when the hot-air stat balloon bursts with adversity, and push comes to win, Romo panics, starts yelling at everybody, then sits on the bench with his head bowed so low it's practically in his lap. Then Romo gets back on the field and tries to play superman, and ends up telegraphing every play, leading to umpteen turnovers because opposing defenses can read our QB like a book.

JG better light a fire under Romo by holding him more accountable, or his job is in jeopardy. And you better believe he knows it. I think Monday showed that when he benched Romo and the receivers. I know some believe it was because JG didn't want to get them killed, but 34-10 is not a total blow-out. Certainly, I've seen other qb's bring their team back from that. Make no mistake, that was a benching and deservedly so.

Our HC is, no doubt, experiencing a painful learning curve, but JG has the makings of a good leader and HC. I saw that with Kitna under center and playing with the same OL that got Romo injured and the same play-calling that Romo can't seem to execute if his life depended on it.
 
How many mistakes did Romo make against Chicago and what were they?
 
StarWiz2;4767939 said:
I think Monday showed that when he benched Romo and the receivers. I know some believe it was because JG didn't want to get them killed, but 34-10 is not a total blow-out. Certainly, I've seen other qb's bring their team back from that. Make no mistake, that was a benching and deservedly so.
:rolleyes: Really?
 
StarWiz2;4767939 said:
What you see is exactly what Romo is: an aging, but talented QB still playing sandlot football, because in his mind, football is just a game, after all; there are more important things in life, like family and friends. Which is partly true. But there's another unspoken truth, which Romo doesn't seem to have grasped, and that is that playing QB for the Cowboys is not a game, it's a high-paying job. JJ isn't paying Romo to play sandlot football. He's paying Romo to take the Cowboys to the Super Bowl and win it. So, Romo, imo, has yet to understand that life is also all about doing your job to the best of your ability, and not treating it like it's only a game that grownups play on Sundays. And when you don't do your job well in football you're gonna get benched, just like if you don't do your job in real life you're gonna get fired!

I've always thought that Romo lacked the elite QB's passion and respect for the game of football. Say what you will about Rodgers, Eli, Ben, Brady et.al, they all play the game to win, and they fight to the last moment to do so. Romo seems to give up quickly after he struggles, or the team struggles. You can see it in his body language. To make everything worse, a lot of people(fans, coaches and JJ) make excuses for his poor play by blaming the OL, blaming his receivers, or blaming JG for the poor play calling. Even the defense gets blamed for not bailing him out. Only certain media members seemed to be demanding accountability, which is why I thought Galloway's article was spot on for once, and not extreme or prejudicial.

Listen, if you lack that fire-in-the-belly for your job, innate talent will only take you only so far. In Romo's case, his stats scream how talented he is, but when the hot-air stat balloon bursts with adversity, and push comes to win, Romo panics, starts yelling at everybody, then sits on the bench with his head bowed so low it's practically in his lap. Then Romo gets back on the field and tries to play superman, and ends up telegraphing every play, leading to umpteen turnovers because opposing defenses can read our QB like a book.

JG better light a fire under Romo by holding him more accountable, or his job is in jeopardy. And you better believe he knows it. I think Monday showed that when he benched Romo and the receivers. I know some believe it was because JG didn't want to get them killed, but 34-10 is not a total blow-out. Certainly, I've seen other qb's bring their team back from that. Make no mistake, that was a benching and deservedly so.

Our HC is, no doubt, experiencing a painful learning curve, but JG has the makings of a good leader and HC. I saw that with Kitna under center and playing with the same OL that got Romo injured and the same play-calling that Romo can't seem to execute if his life depended on it.


You might want to dig that foxhole a little deeper.


Craig
 
I never really thought about Aikman being a game manager becuase he simply won games.

However, it was brought up on the same radio show that Aikman did a very good job of managing games. Now grant it he did have some talent around him.

I think I am just tired oh hearing Romo say the same thing after big losses.
"Its frustrating and we need to look at the tape" are his exact words after every loss. Hello, I think we are all frustrated, now its time to figure out a way to fix it, even if it means not picking up your paycheck on Tuesday.

How about we or I need to take better care of the ball and I this is something I need to work on in practice. Just a thought.
 
I wonder how many of you praising Aikman actually got to see Aikman play?

Not to take anything from Aikman, but he had an outstanding team around him, including a great defense. He was great during the SB years, at MANAGING the game. But try to recall when his line aged and retired; when Michael, Jay and Alvin moved on. How great was he at MANAGING the game then?

You have to remember that football is the ultimate team game, and Romo can play great and still look crappy. It takes a full team effort, and that is something that the Cowboys have not put together in a very long, long time.
 
Mr Cowboy;4768136 said:
I wonder how many of you praising Aikman actually got to see Aikman play?

Not to take anything from Aikman, but he had an outstanding team around him, including a great defense. He was great during the SB years, at MANAGING the game. But try to recall when his line aged and retired; when Michael, Jay and Alvin moved on. How great was he at MANAGING the game then?

You have to remember that football is the ultimate team game, and Romo can play great and still look crappy. It takes a full team effort, and that is something that the Cowboys have not put together in a very long, long time.

I saw Aikman play his entire career. While you can argue that Aikman had more talent around him at the peak of his career; he had very little at the beginning or end. The first year that Aikman played was brutal, luckily he was mentally tough enough to overcome the beatings. At the end of his time he was physically limited by concussions and lingering back problems as well as being surrounded by lesser talent created by "cap hell". So, at the end of the day can you compare Aikman to Romo? Yes, you can. You can compare the stats and say that Romo is superior in some aspects of the game. But then again the stats don't tell the whole story. For if you actually watch Aikman play you see a man that demanded the best of not only himself but of those around him. You watch Romo play and you see a man that at times looks lost and is content with saying "we'll do better next time". Well guess what folks? The days of Romo being able to play at his current skillset is fading faster than most realize and "doing better next time" is looking less likely game by game.



Craig
 
links18;4768031 said:
How many mistakes did Romo make against Chicago and what were they?

Missed two wide open TD throws.

Did not secure ball resulting in fumble/int Bears TD.

On the int that Dez keeps getting blamed for, even if Dez runs correct route, there are two defenders there, so he would be throwing into double coverage anyway, another pcik 6.

Two int's that were 100% on him, albeit the game was decided by then.
 
links18;4768031 said:
How many mistakes did Romo make against Chicago and what were they?

Missed a wide open Dez for a TD, missed a wide open Miles in the endzone, Fumbled the ball when we were in scoring position instead of just taking the sack(second week in a row) threw 2 more interceptions.

Some of those listed are MASSIVE mistakes. In a game of inches you can't afford them.
 
This line of thinking has no merit.

"Run for your life, and complete the 3rd and 8." That's Romo only option in managing the game.
 
Mr Cowboy;4768136 said:
I wonder how many of you praising Aikman actually got to see Aikman play?

Not to take anything from Aikman, but he had an outstanding team around him, including a great defense. He was great during the SB years, at MANAGING the game. But try to recall when his line aged and retired; when Michael, Jay and Alvin moved on. How great was he at MANAGING the game then?

You have to remember that football is the ultimate team game, and Romo can play great and still look crappy. It takes a full team effort, and that is something that the Cowboys have not put together in a very long, long time.

Man, i guess I am old but some of these fans in here suck! I can't believe the heat Romo is taking from some people. He is the only thing this team has worth watching! Make no mistake, the teams SUCKS without Romo. With him, they have a chance and are 2-2...like the Giants, Packers, Patriots, or Roethlisberger sitting at 1-2 etc. Interesting that Arizona is riding Kolb and is 4-0...who would rather have Kolb over Romo?

Brees is 0-4...boy, he sucks. Yeah, yeah, they all won SB's. Because they all had supporting casts! Seriously, some of the people on this board should think back to the end of the Aikman era and the pain of watching the revolving door of QB's under JJ...Romo would be starting for at least 15 other teams in the league TOMORROW if we cut him loose.

Disgusted. :bang2:
 
Padd;4768398 said:
Man, i guess I am old but some of these fans in here suck! I can't believe the heat Romo is taking from some people. He is the only thing this team has worth watching! Make no mistake, the teams SUCKS without Romo. With him, they have a chance and are 2-2...like the Giants, Packers, Patriots, or Roethlisberger sitting at 1-2 etc. Interesting that Arizona is riding Kolb and is 4-0...who would rather have Kolb over Romo?

Brees is 0-4...boy, he sucks. Yeah, yeah, they all won SB's. Because they all had supporting casts! Seriously, some of the people on this board should think back to the end of the Aikman era and the pain of watching the revolving door of QB's under JJ...Romo would be starting for at least 15 other teams in the league TOMORROW if we cut him loose.

Disgusted. :bang2:
Most Romo pajama wearers say he would be starting for 30 other teams, as he is the 3rd best in the business!
 
Padd;4768398 said:
Man, i guess I am old but some of these fans in here suck! I can't believe the heat Romo is taking from some people. He is the only thing this team has worth watching! Make no mistake, the teams SUCKS without Romo. With him, they have a chance and are 2-2...like the Giants, Packers, Patriots, or Roethlisberger sitting at 1-2 etc. Interesting that Arizona is riding Kolb and is 4-0...who would rather have Kolb over Romo?

Brees is 0-4...boy, he sucks. Yeah, yeah, they all won SB's. Because they all had supporting casts! Seriously, some of the people on this board should think back to the end of the Aikman era and the pain of watching the revolving door of QB's under JJ...Romo would be starting for at least 15 other teams in the league TOMORROW if we cut him loose.

Disgusted. :bang2:


Really? Defend this for me below and please don't blame the offensive line. They actually did a decent job last night.

Missed a wide open Dez for a TD, missed a wide open Miles in the endzone, Fumbled the ball when we were in scoring position instead of just taking the sack(second week in a row) threw 2 more interceptions.

Some of those listed are MASSIVE mistakes. In a game of inches you can't afford them.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,040
Messages
14,508,617
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top