dboyz
Active Member
- Messages
- 819
- Reaction score
- 101
In Parcells PC yesterday the LBOH interpreted Parcells' rationale (better for us as we are presently comprised) for changing to Romo as the offensive line does not block well enough for Bledsoe. Parcells said there was more to it than that and pointed out that Romo has a quicker release, gets the ball out quicker.
The quicker release certainly helps the offensive line, but if it is deeper than just that as Parcells suggests, my theory is that Romo is better at throwing the short WCO routes that TO is so good at slants, curls, outs, crossing routes, etc. Drew never seemed to connect real well with TO on these short routes. He's just not at good at the quick short throws or short drops. Maybe Romo can maximize TO's effectiveness on these routes.
To dovetail on this a little, earlier in the year we showed some empty backfied five wide sets and other spread formations. I would think we might see more of these now with Romo. He's good at the short drops and getting the ball out quickly and he has a chance to make teams pay when they blitz us in this situation. He can also escape the pocket and run if necessary.
The quicker release certainly helps the offensive line, but if it is deeper than just that as Parcells suggests, my theory is that Romo is better at throwing the short WCO routes that TO is so good at slants, curls, outs, crossing routes, etc. Drew never seemed to connect real well with TO on these short routes. He's just not at good at the quick short throws or short drops. Maybe Romo can maximize TO's effectiveness on these routes.
To dovetail on this a little, earlier in the year we showed some empty backfied five wide sets and other spread formations. I would think we might see more of these now with Romo. He's good at the short drops and getting the ball out quickly and he has a chance to make teams pay when they blitz us in this situation. He can also escape the pocket and run if necessary.