Romo article from Roto

Silver N Blue

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,342
Reaction score
8,982
Tony Romo got an offer he couldn’t refuse.
It didn’t come from Denver, Houston or any of the other teams that have been linked to Romo this season (actually, those are the only two). No, the deal Romo couldn’t pass up came from CBS of all places. That’s right—Romo, four-time Pro Bowler and Dallas Cowboys legend, will spend next season in the broadcast booth.
Romo’s decision to retire was the culmination of a two-month impasse. About a month ago, it seemed that Dallas had arrived at a decision. ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported that Romo would be released at the start of free agency. Romo lent credence to that report by posting a goodbye video to Cowboys fans on his Instagram.
But instead, Dallas had a last-minute change of heart. Feeling they could coax a trade out of the quarterback-needy Texans, the Cowboys held on to Romo while the league waited anxiously. Suddenly Dallas went from doing the right thing to essentially holding Romo hostage. Releasing Romo would have allowed him to choose his next team while also serving as a token of appreciation for his 14 years of service.
It looked like the Texans were gearing up for a run at Romo after dealing underachiever Brock Osweiler to Cleveland. On paper, the Cowboys and Texans appeared to be perfect trade partners. In the end, both teams overplayed their hand. The Cowboys felt that they had leverage over Houston, and in a way, they were right. With few big names available in free agency and a weak incoming draft class for quarterbacks, the Texans could either ante up for Romo or take their chances with Tom Savage. Houston isn’t a rebuilding team, either. A healthy Romo (if such a thing exists) would have made the Texans instant contenders.
Ultimately, the Cowboys didn’t have much leverage either. There was no way the Cowboys were keeping Romo as a $14 million backup. With that knowledge in hand, why would the Texans trade a draft pick for Romo when they could just wait a few weeks for him to be a free agent?
Owner and de facto Cowboys GM Jerry Jones suggested the deadlock could last until training camp while former agent Joel Corry predicted the saga would end much sooner. Turns out, Corry was right. In a detailed analysis for CBS Sports (Romo’s current employer), Corry explained that the Cowboys would eventually cave by April 17, the start date for organized team activities. It would have been extremely awkward to make Romo show up for a team that no longer wanted him, though it could have led to some Kramer-esque comedy. Romo obviously could have just skipped it, but by failing to attend 90 percent of team workouts, he’d be in danger of having his salary reduced by $500,000.
But that’s neither here nor there. Romo was officially released as a post-June 1 cut, which spreads his $19.6 million cap hit over two seasons ($10.7 million against the cap this year, $8.9 million next year). The Cowboys’ all-time leader in passing yards was pursued by a number of networks but none could offer a package as enticing as CBS. At CBS, Romo will replace Phil Simms as the lead color analyst alongside top play-by-play announcer Jim Nantz. Simms and Nantz had been partnered together since 2003.
According to Schefter, Romo’s work at CBS might not be limited to just football. The ex-pigskin-thrower could supplement his football work with a handful of golf assignments, though football will be his emphasis in the beginning. CBS will cover the first slate of Thursday night games next season, meaning Romo should have a busy schedule covering two games a week early in the season.
Romo has left open the possibility of a return, though it’s hard to envision him pulling a Brett Favre given his responsibilities at CBS. If Romo was even slightly hesitant, it’s unlikely he would have taken such a high-profile gig. Not all ex-players are good fits for the broadcasting booth but Romo’s natural charm and immense football knowledge should serve him well in his next line of work.
The 36-year-old leaves behind a complicated legacy. Of course, much of the criticism directed at Romo is unfounded. Though he didn’t enjoy much postseason success, the idea that Romo wasn’t a clutch performer is a pure fallacy. Between 2006-14, no quarterback led more game-winning drives (27) or more fourth-quarter comebacks (23) than Romo. It’s unfortunate that injuries, a string of bad postseason luck and an uncomfortable exit will cloud our memory of him, but nobody is denying Romo’s Hall of Fame credentials. His career 97.1 quarterback rating is the fourth-highest in NFL history ahead of Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Peyton Manning and plenty of other sure-fire Hall of Famers.
Romo’s last healthy season came in 2014. That year he guided the Cowboys to an impressive 12-4 record while leading the league with a career-best 113.4 quarterback rating. Like most years during Romo’s hectic tenure in Dallas, the season ended in heartbreaking fashion. Dez Bryant couldn’t reel in (or did he?) Romo’s desperation heave late in a Divisional Round loss to Green Bay, ruining what may have been Romo’s best chance at making the Super Bowl.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
36,649
Reaction score
31,939
Cowboys played it right and Romo made the correct decision. Houston is the only loser
The jury is still out on how the Cowboys played this and Romo's decision. I suspect the whole story is still untold and once finally told, it will differ a bit from the one just told by the OP. If Romo blows this CBS gig (doubt he will) his decision to leave football to pursue a broadcasting career will look foolish. Houston is the sure fire loser in all of this.
 

Silver N Blue

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,342
Reaction score
8,982
Disagree on all accounts.

Houston is definitely a loser, but so are fans and the NFL on the whole (I'd say it's not best for Romo either, but that's his decision).
Do you think it may have just come down to not wanting to risk further damage to his back? I know he is saying is healthy but he hasn't played very much since 14 and being healthy at this point could be relative. Maybe Emmitt called him and said Tony....its just not worth it..if it's time to leave leave as a Cowboy.
 

Longboysfan

hipfake08
Messages
13,316
Reaction score
5,797
I'm thinking the Cowboys played it correctly in regards to Romo.
If he wanted to keep playing then good for him. Maybe it was not a good fit for him or moving to another city at this point.
Also the injury factor involved here.

The Cowboys have treated him more than fairly in regards to his contract and the money paid in advance of services rendered.
Well in this case not rendered. So Romo get's to keep well over 12.5 million dollars of money already paid to him by the Cowboys.
Because the way the Cowboys ended his contract.

Had Romo just retired then he would have owed the Cowboys any pre-paid bonus money that was on the last three remaining years of the contract.

If this is the way an employer treats you - then sign me up for the over pay plan with no payback at the end.
 

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,796
Reaction score
16,665
Tony Romo got an offer he couldn’t refuse.
It didn’t come from Denver, Houston or any of the other teams that have been linked to Romo this season (actually, those are the only two). No, the deal Romo couldn’t pass up came from CBS of all places. That’s right—Romo, four-time Pro Bowler and Dallas Cowboys legend, will spend next season in the broadcast booth.
Romo’s decision to retire was the culmination of a two-month impasse. About a month ago, it seemed that Dallas had arrived at a decision. ESPN’s Adam Schefter reported that Romo would be released at the start of free agency. Romo lent credence to that report by posting a goodbye video to Cowboys fans on his Instagram.
But instead, Dallas had a last-minute change of heart. Feeling they could coax a trade out of the quarterback-needy Texans, the Cowboys held on to Romo while the league waited anxiously. Suddenly Dallas went from doing the right thing to essentially holding Romo hostage. Releasing Romo would have allowed him to choose his next team while also serving as a token of appreciation for his 14 years of service.
It looked like the Texans were gearing up for a run at Romo after dealing underachiever Brock Osweiler to Cleveland. On paper, the Cowboys and Texans appeared to be perfect trade partners. In the end, both teams overplayed their hand. The Cowboys felt that they had leverage over Houston, and in a way, they were right. With few big names available in free agency and a weak incoming draft class for quarterbacks, the Texans could either ante up for Romo or take their chances with Tom Savage. Houston isn’t a rebuilding team, either. A healthy Romo (if such a thing exists) would have made the Texans instant contenders.
Ultimately, the Cowboys didn’t have much leverage either. There was no way the Cowboys were keeping Romo as a $14 million backup. With that knowledge in hand, why would the Texans trade a draft pick for Romo when they could just wait a few weeks for him to be a free agent?
Owner and de facto Cowboys GM Jerry Jones suggested the deadlock could last until training camp while former agent Joel Corry predicted the saga would end much sooner. Turns out, Corry was right. In a detailed analysis for CBS Sports (Romo’s current employer), Corry explained that the Cowboys would eventually cave by April 17, the start date for organized team activities. It would have been extremely awkward to make Romo show up for a team that no longer wanted him, though it could have led to some Kramer-esque comedy. Romo obviously could have just skipped it, but by failing to attend 90 percent of team workouts, he’d be in danger of having his salary reduced by $500,000.
But that’s neither here nor there. Romo was officially released as a post-June 1 cut, which spreads his $19.6 million cap hit over two seasons ($10.7 million against the cap this year, $8.9 million next year). The Cowboys’ all-time leader in passing yards was pursued by a number of networks but none could offer a package as enticing as CBS. At CBS, Romo will replace Phil Simms as the lead color analyst alongside top play-by-play announcer Jim Nantz. Simms and Nantz had been partnered together since 2003.
According to Schefter, Romo’s work at CBS might not be limited to just football. The ex-pigskin-thrower could supplement his football work with a handful of golf assignments, though football will be his emphasis in the beginning. CBS will cover the first slate of Thursday night games next season, meaning Romo should have a busy schedule covering two games a week early in the season.
Romo has left open the possibility of a return, though it’s hard to envision him pulling a Brett Favre given his responsibilities at CBS. If Romo was even slightly hesitant, it’s unlikely he would have taken such a high-profile gig. Not all ex-players are good fits for the broadcasting booth but Romo’s natural charm and immense football knowledge should serve him well in his next line of work.
The 36-year-old leaves behind a complicated legacy. Of course, much of the criticism directed at Romo is unfounded. Though he didn’t enjoy much postseason success, the idea that Romo wasn’t a clutch performer is a pure fallacy. Between 2006-14, no quarterback led more game-winning drives (27) or more fourth-quarter comebacks (23) than Romo. It’s unfortunate that injuries, a string of bad postseason luck and an uncomfortable exit will cloud our memory of him, but nobody is denying Romo’s Hall of Fame credentials. His career 97.1 quarterback rating is the fourth-highest in NFL history ahead of Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Peyton Manning and plenty of other sure-fire Hall of Famers.
Romo’s last healthy season came in 2014. That year he guided the Cowboys to an impressive 12-4 record while leading the league with a career-best 113.4 quarterback rating. Like most years during Romo’s hectic tenure in Dallas, the season ended in heartbreaking fashion. Dez Bryant couldn’t reel in (or did he?) Romo’s desperation heave late in a Divisional Round loss to Green Bay, ruining what may have been Romo’s best chance at making the Super Bowl.
good article, noticed this
"Romo has left open the possibility of a return, though it’s hard to envision him pulling a Brett Favre given his responsibilities at CBS"
wonder what they meant by that,I doubt anyone has details on his contract.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,982
Reaction score
48,729
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
It was clear that he could play in Houston.
The delay in his release let him weigh all the TV offers and an extremely rare opportunty came up (4 in 60 years). Sounds like he went back and forth, but is at peace wirh his decision.
 

Silver N Blue

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,342
Reaction score
8,982
good article, noticed this
"Romo has left open the possibility of a return, though it’s hard to envision him pulling a Brett Favre given his responsibilities at CBS"
wonder what they meant by that,I doubt anyone has details on his contract.
Yeah might just be nothing more than an opinion. I would be shocked myself if he did but you never know.
 

DandyDon52

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,796
Reaction score
16,665
I'd say Phil Simms lost pretty big too - although it could be argued that his loss is the viewer's gain...
Phil did it since 1998, and he wasnt fired, they will just move him elsewhere, they were deciding what to do with him.
 

JD_KaPow

jimnabby
Messages
11,072
Reaction score
10,836
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Disagree on all accounts.

Houston is definitely a loser, but so are fans and the NFL on the whole (I'd say it's not best for Romo either, but that's his decision).
Fans of the NFL get to not listen to Phil Simms anymore. I can't imagine a bigger win than that.
 

DeaconMoss

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,392
Reaction score
7,302
Live from Houston

133036511_13894057970451n.jpg
 
Top