ShortRound
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 26,761
- Reaction score
- 94,073
If you want to read it that way, yes that's how it sounds. Or if he was talking about any other team, he'd probably use the exact same words.Sounds like Romo is not fond of Garrett
Definitely sounds like Romo and Garrett have become bitter rivals .
Didn't call him Jason , not even Garrett ...
If he'd said, "because Garrett is still there......", then it would've sounded like a pot shot. Saying, "because the HC is still there...." is saying that the terminology usually doesn't change when the HC remains.Definitely sounds like Romo and Garrett have become bitter rivals .
Didn't call him Jason , not even Garrett ...
but did you see how nicely he put that nothing will change since JG is there?Interesting how formal his response sounds. Referring to Garrett as "the head coach".........
Two people you couldn't separate four years ago. Wonder if they still share Christmas cards (lol).
He didn't say "nothing will change". He said "they'll probably stay pretty similar", which would be the case regardless of which team and remaining HC he was talking about.but did you see how nicely he put that nothing will change since JG is there?
Seriously every coaching position except HC has been blamed since 2010Seems pointless to speculate how the new scapegoat will perform differently than the last scapegoat.
Interesting how formal his response sounds. Referring to Garrett as "the head coach".........
I was kinda reading between the lines, Tony's no fool.He didn't say "nothing will change". He said "they'll probably stay pretty similar", which would be the case regardless of which team and remaining HC he was talking about.
Sounds like your trying to read something that isn’t there.Sounds like Romo is not fond of Garrett
