I forgot to answer the actual question. Anyone can look back on my posts during the time where the team was getting into QB controversy mode back in 2016. I said it was a dumb decision. It was never about Dak vs Romo, but about whether the team could be even better under the savvier, more talented and experienced QB. Starters should never lose their jobs to injury, and believing in "voodoo" harming win streaks due to a change and platitudes such as chemistry and leadership are not how you objectively assess actual football matters. Garrett was a sycophantic politician through and through, who only kept his job for so long because of Romo keeping terrible teams at .500, his family's past relationship with the Jones family, and nostalgia from the 90s and that Thanksgiving "throw the ball up" game. Even the credit given to him by some for finally upgrading the offensive line by 2014 is just football 101 (build in the trenches). Dak is in the same mold. A guy who knows his limitations but will say the right things to keep his job. He's just not good enough.
Also, I believe in Karma, "what goes around comes around", "you reap what you sow", etc., however you phrase it. If you make wrongful decisions, persist in them, and don't change course because you refuse to learn from history, you deserve the ramifications. It's the definition of insanity given by Einstein. All of those who were willfully bashing and repeatedly (and IMO, wrongfully) calling Romo a choker were "rewarded" with an even bigger one.
