Romo to run the read option?

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
A word of warning to the traditionalists like me, you might want to stop and put away the sharp objects and Ozzy music now before you read any further.....

So I'm flipping across the dial, and I land on some Cowboys talk and a stop-by from Mike Fisher on The Fan. For those not familiar with Fisher, he's kicked around Dallas for many years through a number of jobs. He's the Keith Olbermann of this market. Very good reporter who has a bad habit of letting his bad temper and politics bleed into his content. But you can generally trust what he says regarding Cowboys information.

This morning, Fisher offered this, regarding the league, the Cowboys, and the read option. This is a paraphrase, but I think it pretty much captures what he said.

The Cowboys had better start addressing the read-option defensively, and Monte Kiffin said they are, especially now that the cameras are out of practice.

Teams in the NFL are not only working on the read-option, they're working on offenses that can have literally 4 or 5 options in a single play, with a hand-off, quick pass, bubble screen, and QB keeper all rolled into the same play. LOTS of teams are installing this. It's up to the QB to decide at the line of scrimmage which play to run based on the defensive front; the other players just run the play and expect the ball without knowing what the QB will do, so noone has to think. A team can basically have 4-5 plays alone, and run them up and down the field in no huddle all game long (to prevent substitutions on defense).

In fact, the Cowboys had better get started on putting this into their offense, too. They don't want to be the last team to do this. And in fact, perhaps that's a lot of what they mean by Romo being more involved in the offense and playcalling this season. We may see the Cowboys with their own version of the read-option, pistol offense this year.

I had three reactions to this: (1) Yes, it makes sense that this is where things are headed after what Washington, Seattle, and San Francisco accomplished last year, (2) it sounds like dumb-downed, pick-up football at the local elementary school, and (3) it's awfully depressing if this is what the NFL is devolving into.

Soon, we may see the last of the stately, cerebral quarterback who rides herd over the team to John Facenda and NFL Films music. Instead, we may see a series of athletic, college-like quarterbacks that make quick 5-6 year career runs and are relatively easily replaced, and NFL Films reverts to a more MTV video format.

My DNA says no, perhaps in desperation, that the defensive talent in the NFL and the coordinators will find a way to solve this conundrum, and we'll get back to more drop-back passing and a traditional running game. I certainly hope so.

But a quick glance at those uniforms in Jacksonville and Seattle, and now this news, and I'm growing more and more convinced that we're headed to an Oregon Duck looking league, both in style and substance. Sooner or later, probably sooner.

I feel my football-watching days slipping away. I just don't think I'll ever come around to that style of football. I have no taste for 38-35 football games, which college football is now.

I'll have to leave it to the young whippersnappers with their short attention spans and online Madden football leagues. They'll be the paying customers soon enough.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
They aren't going to have their $100m 33 year old QB running bootlegs and scrambling all the time. The read option wont be a staple of the Cowboys offense.

What is possible, is that he goes up to the line with multiple options every play, and we actually use that in a no huddle situation. But to think we are going to run the read option is just silly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BAZ

lurkercowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,066
Reaction score
1,352
Wasn't there a play in the Oakland game where Romo had the option of either handing off or passing and ended up passing to Bryant after a pump fake?
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
They aren't going to have their $100m 33 year old QB running bootlegs and scrambling all the time. The read option wont be a staple of the Cowboys offense.

What is possible, is that he goes up to the line with multiple options every play, and we actually use that in a no huddle situation. But to think we are going to run the read option is just silly.

You took it too literally. I'm talking an offense where Romo has three or four options at the line of scrimmage.

According to Fisher, this is what the Patriots are doing more and more of with Brady.

EJ Manuel, Geno Smith, RGIII, Kaepernick, Wilson......that's the kind of QB that teams are drafting now.

Next thing you know, Dez Bryant in 8th grade won't play receiver anymore. He'll be a quarterback.
 

Future

Intramural Legend
Messages
27,566
Reaction score
14,714
You took it too literally. I'm talking an offense where Romo has three or four options at the line of scrimmage.

According to Fisher, this is what the Patriots are doing more and more of with Brady.

EJ Manuel, Geno Smith, RGIII, Kaepernick, Wilson......that's the kind of QB that teams are drafting now.

Next thing you know, Dez Bryant in 8th grade won't play receiver anymore. He'll be a quarterback.

literally 4 or 5 options in a single play, with a hand-off, quick pass, bubble screen, and QB keeper all rolled into the same play.

Thats what I was referring to. Id bet that every team has stuff in their playbook where the QB has options, and has for years. This is nothing groundbreaking, imo. The defensive formations dictate playcalls at the line all the time, so its hard to say that these options are really anything special.

The problem with some of what is mentioned in the bolded, when they say you can just no huddle down the field with only 4 or 5 plays, is that, eventually defenses are going to guess right, and take the ball the other way. I dont think it will work in the NFL. Its a gimmick college offense, and too simplistic - believe it or not - for the NFL.

And, when you take the QB run out of the equation, which would be true in Dallas, that frees up one more defender. Meaning instead of 7 guys defending 6, there is now 7 defending 5. Thats a huge difference.
 

WV Cowboy

Waitin' on the 6th
Messages
11,604
Reaction score
1,744
EJ Manuel, Geno Smith, RGIII, Kaepernick, Wilson......that's the kind of QB that teams are drafting now.

Geno Smith does not belong in that group, he does not possess the running skills that the others have. Not even close.

He can move around the pocket and buy some time, or scramble a little if necessary, .. but he is not a running QB.
 

erod

Well-Known Member
Messages
38,705
Reaction score
60,327
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Geno Smith does not belong in that group, he does not possess the running skills that the others have. Not even close.

He can move around the pocket and buy some time, or scramble a little if necessary, .. but he is not a running QB.

10 years ago, he would have gone undrafted.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,107
Reaction score
11,452
Why would he go undrafted? I don't think he's that good, but not drafted at all?

Also, you seem to hate the running QB and the option. But you admit we could do more of what the Patriots do. You don't think Brady is a pretty traditional QB?

And I don't see what's wrong with Dez playing QB. Putting your best athlete at QB is as old as the hills.
 

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,649
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Cowboys’ notes: Romo will have more leeway on audibles
By Charean Williams

cjwilliams@star-telegram.com

OXNARD, Calif. — The Dallas Cowboys are giving Tony Romo more responsibility this season. That includes additional freedom for him to audible at the line of scrimmage.

“I think they all go hand in hand together,” Romo said Wednesday. “I think more than anything when you’re in there, and you’re part of understanding what we’re trying to do, you know what we’re looking for and what we’re not and what we want to run versus what not.

“So yeah, I’m sure I’ll probably do a little more from time to time at the line. That’s not every time and that doesn’t mean every game. It just means that capability is there for us, and we’ve been doing a lot of different things to practice that stuff, and it’ll just add to our package.”

Romo said he and new play-caller Bill Callahan are finding a rhythm after spending training camp together in meetings as well as on the practice field.

“I don’t know how much time it is, but it’s hours every day that we’re outside the football field that we’re in meetings together, that we’re talking and going over stuff, and it’s a good thing,” Romo said. “It’s been a real good rapport. Bill’s got a good mind for football just like Jason, and it just allows us to do a lot of different things that we all put our heads together and kind of attack them.”

More notes: http://www.star-telegram.com/2013/08/14/5081559/cowboys-notes-romo-will-have-more.html
 

FiveRings

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,782
Reaction score
247
Why don't we have a RB play QB in scout team/practice squad situations? Unless we get a scrambling QB (which I doubt because we're so on the fence about even keeping Tanney) a skill position player is our best bet.
 

Rockport

AmberBeer
Messages
46,580
Reaction score
46,004
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
They might run the read option, but one of the options won't be for Romo to run.
 

Califan007

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,468
Reaction score
331
That's not really the read option you're describing in the OP...that's more like audibles on steroids lol.

Read option isn't about the QB making the decision based on what he sees at the LOS. It's about making the decision after the ball has been snapped. The QB's speed and legit passing skills make the read option dangerous. Put a QB back there that can't do both and you're watering the read option down...it won't be nearly as effective.
 

TheCoolFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,136
Reaction score
9,853
Wish we had brought in a true dual-threat QB for training camp instead of both Stephens/Tanney. Yeah they can put a random WR or RB at QB to simulate during practices but I'd rather have someone who has experience running it.
 

WV Cowboy

Waitin' on the 6th
Messages
11,604
Reaction score
1,744
Along these lines, take a look at this hit.

http://espn.go.com/video/clip?id=9587850&categoryid=2378529

Bostic was fined $21K for that textbook hit. There's where the league is headed.

Things like this are really taking their toll on me erod, .. this is changing the game I love. The NFL thinks their product is so strong that they can do anything and we will all still watch. That is a dangerous and slippery slope I think.

I am coming to grips with the fact that I am not as interested in the NFL as I have previously been.

Between all of the ridiculous rules changes, players and coaches changing teams every year, media bombardment, etc., .. they are killing my love of football.
 

Aikmaniac

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,126
Reaction score
1,219
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Things like this are really taking their toll on me erod, .. this is changing the game I love. The NFL thinks their product is so strong that they can do anything and we will all still watch. That is a dangerous and slippery slope I think.

I am coming to grips with the fact that I am not as interested in the NFL as I have previously been.

Between all of the ridiculous rules changes, players and coaches changing teams every year, media bombardment, etc., .. they are killing my love of football.

It's funny. I was talking with a friend of mine I grew up with about the fact that I knew every team's quarterback and backup quarterback when I was a kid. Today I can't even keep up with coaches as you mentioned. I realize we all have more important things to think about as adults, but I do believe kids today would have difficulty as well.

I remember loving to watch Ronnie Lott, Steve Atwater, Chuck Cecil, Joey Browner, etc. destroy WR's over the middle. Even more recently I miss watching running backs "punch" stiffarm like MBIII. Everyone knows it's a rough game.

Playing devil's advocate though, I can see why the NFL is so shell-shocked right now. We live in a world that is sue happy and incredibly sensitive. I cannot imagine the dollars the NFL spends on legal representation and constant settlements. Throw in the fact of all the class-action cases going on with ex-players and their health during retirement. Something has to be done, unfortunately. Look at the new "Heads Up" campaign. The NFL is forcefeeding their proactiveness to the fanbase.

In summary, it will take a lot to kill the unparalleled following of this game, but that doesn't mean it won't eventually happen.
 

Corso

Offseason mode... sleepy time
Messages
34,768
Reaction score
63,194
I have zero problems with Romo audibling and changing plays at the line of scrimmage.
He's a smart player that knows his stuff.
I more worry about all the other players being on the same page when he makes changes.

I'm cautiously optimistic that they are getting more efficient in that aspect.
 
Top