Romo's career record as starter?

wesleyc288;4268297 said:
I was curious what romos record is as a starter in the nfl. Anyone know?

Never good enough.
 
How about come from behind victories? Had one last week and another this week.
 
Jimz31;4268327 said:
How about come from behind victories? Had one last week and another this week.
13 as of today's win, 4 this season.
 
I wonder what Staubach's come from behind record was. I guess I'll go look that up.
 
Most important stat? 1 playoff win in 4 appearances. Wouldn't you all agree that is more important then regular season records? I would love to see playoff success. I am just stating the fact here. If he plays like he did today with those pics in the playoffs this team will not win. Go ahead and flame away. I am just not all sunshine and roses with Romo.
 
CowboyStar88;4268540 said:
Most important stat? 1 playoff win in 4 appearances. Wouldn't you all agree that is more important then regular season records? I would love to see playoff success. I am just stating the fact here. If he plays like he did today with those pics in the playoffs this team will not win. Go ahead and flame away. I am just not all sunshine and roses with Romo.

How long did it take P. Manning again?

Geez, people act like this is an individual sport. I remember well Crayton dropping a pass while we were driving down the field resulting in a punt that essentially was a pivotal play in the game. Romo hit him in the hands in that game....a playoff game....dropped by the WR.

QB's get too much credit AND get too much blame...especially since this is what? A TEAM SPORT.
 
Jimz31;4268563 said:
How long did it take P. Manning again?

Geez, people act like this is an individual sport. I remember well Crayton dropping a pass while we were driving down the field resulting in a punt that essentially was a pivotal play in the game. Romo hit him in the hands in that game....a playoff game....dropped by the WR.

QB's get too much credit AND get too much blame...especially since this is what? A TEAM SPORT.

I wasn't talking about Manning. I don't care what Manning has and hasn't accomplished. Oh and BTW look at his team without him. I am talking about Romo. It's always the same old argument with the Romo happy fans if so and so did this or that its a team sport. Bottom line is the QB is judged by wins and losses in the Playoffs and right now he is a losing QB. One play isn't going to change the outcome since it wasn't the final play of the game. There were plenty of opportunities to put the giants and seahawks away and they didn't.
 
CowboyStar88;4268572 said:
I wasn't talking about Manning. I don't care what Manning has and hasn't accomplished. Oh and BTW look at his team without him. I am talking about Romo. It's always the same old argument with the Romo happy fans if so and so did this or that its a team sport. Bottom line is the QB is judged by wins and losses in the Playoffs and right now he is a losing QB. One play isn't going to change the outcome since it wasn't the final play of the game. There were plenty of opportunities to put the giants and seahawks away and they didn't.

Yeah, look at his team...look at their defense which Manning doesn't play. The best thing for Manning this year is that this doesn't hurt his career stats. Do you honestly think that the Colts would have a winning record with Manning in there?

And you are right, this IS one of the problems with people that look at football as an individual sport....It's not my fault that the media wants to give the coaches and the QB only a W or L. This is not the reality of what a team sport is.

Same thing with Baseball. A pitcher and the coach are the only ones that get the W/L, yet if he doesn't get some help his record will look much worse than it is IN REALITY.

It's not ME in the paradigm that is screwed up and sees a team win or lose and says it was ONLY because of the ONE individual that gets this W or L. It takes 10 other guys doing their job to get the desired result.
 
Without Romo, we don't win. The guy has a magic about him. His playoff loses?
Seattle - Botched snap, we all know about that.

New York - Not one but TWO mistakes by Crayton. The O-Line was letting the Giants D pound Romo and he still delivered two strikes that Crayton would have scored on and he missed them. NOT THE QB's FAULT.

Minnesota - NO QB IN HISTORY could have won that game with the little to zero amount of time he had to throw before getting crushed.

Wake up people! Cowboystar88, you can't see the forest for the trees. I see you have over a 1,000 posts. I sure hope all those other ones were spent talking about something that doesn't make you look ignorant of the facts.
 
CowboyStar88;4268540 said:
Most important stat? 1 playoff win in 4 appearances. Wouldn't you all agree that is more important then regular season records? I would love to see playoff success. I am just stating the fact here. If he plays like he did today with those pics in the playoffs this team will not win. Go ahead and flame away. I am just not all sunshine and roses with Romo.
NO NO NO NO NO

I've said it before, and I guess it's not really fair, but I'll say it again.

This team wins because of Tony, and loses as a unit. The whole team has been bad in the playoffs.
 
CowboyStar88;4268572 said:
I wasn't talking about Manning. I don't care what Manning has and hasn't accomplished. Oh and BTW look at his team without him. I am talking about Romo. It's always the same old argument with the Romo happy fans if so and so did this or that its a team sport. Bottom line is the QB is judged by wins and losses in the Playoffs and right now he is a losing QB. One play isn't going to change the outcome since it wasn't the final play of the game. There were plenty of opportunities to put the giants and seahawks away and they didn't.

You sore because Romo won us the game today? Did you have money on the Phins?

However anyone else judges QB play is irrelevant. I will judge a QB's play based on what I see him do on the field.

In his playoff appearances:

1. Seattle loss: BP lost that game with a bad game plan. Despite this Romo, the QB, led us down the field for a game winning FGA. The holder dropped a slick ball. I don't see how you can blame this on Romo, the QB.

2. NYG loss in 2007: This was a team on a roll who we almost beat except for bad OL play and two mistakes by Patrick Crayton.

3. Minnesota loss in 2009: This was purely on the OL. Anyone who argues anything different doesn't know anything about football. Our OL was torn apart. Romo was on his back within 2 seconds against a 4-man rush play after play after play. He never had a chance at all in this game and everyone knows it.

Anyhow, I would be glad to replace Romo at QB if you could find someone better to take his place. Who do you suggest?
 
Hostile;4268300 said:


Tony Romo improved to 35-8 when he attempts 34 or less passes in a game, too. Romo was at 34 on the dot today. He threw two early interceptions, but he didn't implode. He hung in there and got it done. Romo has won 81.3% of those games.
 
If Romo was put on the waiver wire, he wouldn't last 30 seconds before a claim was put in. That is a fact. There is not a team out there that wouldn't want him on their team. Sure, he'd be behind Brady and Rogers on their teams because they are already established, but you can be dang sure they would want Romo to come in for their guys should they get injured.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,040
Messages
14,508,623
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top