Romo's INT

[theogt]

First post



My second post was if Romo puts it where he should have it was a likely td. Ogletree had seven yards to the sideline to work with so if Romo drops it where it should be then yeah the receiver has a likely td. duh

A likely TD, when the CB has perfect coverage?

We should run that route every play.

LOL.

 

[DallasDomination]

Tony Romo is evolving into a quarterback who takes full responsibility for a bad decision...

[youtube]o9N2ipSgtZY[/youtube]

That's not the same quarterback from that press conference last December.

And I like it.

This is the Qb we need to lead to a SB. accountability for the mistake He made and ready to improve and move on.

 

[LarryCanadian]

I actually thought Ogletree looked like he had a step IF the play was designed to go towards sideline/corner of endzone. BUT, the db might have cheated inside already when he saw pass was underthrown as camera angle I saw only showed the WR/DB's when ball was already in the air for a second.

Romo underthrew it under pressure and got buried.

Did anyone notice GURODE pull a Larry Allen on the interception return? He hustled and sprinted real hard and absolutely crushed the db returning the pick on the sideline by bellyflopping on him after pushing him out. Was actually quite a mauling he gave the db, hehe!

LarryCanadian

 

[adzrne7]

This is the Qb we need to lead to a SB. accountability for the mistake He made and ready to improve and move on.

Usually he says that it's just like a punt or when we throw it down field that often those things happen. I'm glad he took the blame for that and hopefully those things get reduced this season.

 

[speedkilz88]

A likely TD, when the CB has perfect coverage?

We should run that route every play.

LOL.

The DB took the inside away, so Ogletree still had the outside. If the qb puts the ball where it needs to go you can beat good coverage. NFL qbs beat good coverage all the time.

 

[theogt]

The DB took the inside away, so Ogletree still had the outside. If the qb puts the ball where it needs to go you can beat good coverage. NFL qbs beat good coverage all the time.

You ever seen a CB take the "outside" on a go route? What the hell?

Dude, give it up.

 

[speedkilz88]

You ever seen a CB take the "outside" on a go route? What the hell?

Dude, give it up.

You've already admitted that Romo was most likely throwing to his back shoulder. You need to give it up.

 

[theogt]

You've already admitted that Romo was most likely throwing to his back shoulder. You need to give it up.

Will you stop avoiding questions?

How could the corner have had better coverage? What position would he need to be in to have better coverage?

 

[Idgit]

The DB took the inside away, so Ogletree still had the outside. If the qb puts the ball where it needs to go you can beat good coverage. NFL qbs beat good coverage all the time.

There's definitely room on that play for Romo to have put the ball where only his WR had a chance to catch it. It doesn't matter how good the inside coverage was.

Romo's problem on the play was thinking he had time to step into a very tough throw. He didn't have the time, and the pick was his fault.

Can we also stop pretending that this is in any way different from the kind of thing that happened to him last year? He's got faith in himself and he takes chances and is a very good QB because of that. Sometimes it bites him in the ***. We live with it. This slagging the guy for nothing all offseason because most of our fans don't know what they're seeing when they watch replays, then looking for shreds of evidence that he's actually changed from the fictional character they thought he was so that they can justify letting him back into the fold is going to drive me nuts before we even get to the first game that counts.

 

[Next_years_Champs]

That interception was clearly on Tony, he should have either taken the sack or tried to elude the rusher. However if he could have gotten the pass to the pylon I don't think the defenders could have broken up the play without interference. If thrown to the pylon that play would have been a in-completion, a pass interference call or a TD.

I just don't see that great of coverage by the defense, the corner was open and it appeared that is where the play was aimed.

 

[McCordsville Cowboy]

Are you explaining why you badmouth our QB in every thread you enter?

We already know.

Lol, No.

He made a bad throw, didnt step into it because he was under pressure. He should have taken the sack or if he wanted to make that throw, step into it and hope he doesn't get injured on the hit he would have received.

Wasn't badmouthing Tony, just pointing out that it seemed like a Baltimore game throw but this time he wasn't "forcing" the ball to #81, he was "forcing" it to #85.

 

[rkell87]

That interception was clearly on Tony, he should have either taken the sack or tried to elude the rusher. However if he could have gotten the pass to the pylon I don't think the defenders could have broken up the play without interference. If thrown to the pylon that play would have been a in-completion, a pass interference call or a TD.

I just don't see that great of coverage by the defense, the corner was open and it appeared that is where the play was aimed.

:signmast: this...except throw it away is the other option not taking the sack and of course dont throw the pick.

 

[Smith22]

1) Witten was wide open over the middle on that play.

2) Romo has to know better. He wasn't blindsided or anything. Take the sack if you already passed over Witten being wide open.

3) As mentioned above, Gurode showed a lot of effort to make the tackle on the INT.

 

[Doomsday101]

Saw the gamecast on NFL.Com, but missed the replay today (Had to take the Mrs. to a wedding shower) Could anyone tell me how it happened?? Romo forcing the ball? Good play by the defender? or miscom. with Ogletree??

He got pressure in his face and made a bad throw. He said afterwards it was his mistake and should have ate it instead of putting it up. I wish I could say that he will never do it again but I have been watching the NFL long enough to know it will happen again as it happens to them all. Those who want perfection forget it, it is not going to happen no matter how much you holler and scream. What we can ask for is that it does not happen too often just weighting the good and bad with Romo I think there is allot more good from him than bad.

 

[zrinkill]

Brady Quinn sure is lighting it up right now too.........

Exactly .....

 

[zrinkill]

Wasn't badmouthing Tony

Nobody that took a look at your history would believe that Mr. "pro football player"

:laugh2:

 

[zrinkill]

That interception was clearly on Tony, he should have either taken the sack or tried to elude the rusher. However if he could have gotten the pass to the pylon I don't think the defenders could have broken up the play without interference. If thrown to the pylon that play would have been a in-completion, a pass interference call or a TD.

I just don't see that great of coverage by the defense, the corner was open and it appeared that is where the play was aimed.

I agree.

 

[theogt]

Will you stop avoiding questions?

How could the corner have had better coverage? What position would he need to be in to have better coverage?

*crickets*

 

[nalam]

similar to the INT he threw to Ed Reed last year....In the sense that Romo kind of just threw it up...and the DB caught it...

Not correct, Guess it was Felix Jones who didn't slow down the guy he is responsible to and Romo was hit (more like diverted ) as he throw. He should have thrown to the corner of Endzone but insted the ball floated without zip between 2 DBs. Easy Pick.Poor decision but What pissed me more is the 56 yard return of the pick.
:bang2:

 

[Use Your Illusion]

That wasn't his only bad pass of that drive. He threw what should have been an INT a few plays earlier, when Dre Bly was all over Miles Austin and Romo still forced it in to him. Bly dropped the pick.