Romo's int's vs Giants

[northernvacowboysfan]

I understand the one on the pass to Witten...i dont see how the pass to Street was an int....he caught the ball made a football move which looked like two steps then got hit and ball popped out..to me that should be a catch and fumble..i dont think that should be an int against Romo...jmo. thoughts?..

 

[ShiningStar]

I understand the one on the pass to Witten...i dont see how the pass to Street was an int....he caught the ball made a football move which looked like two steps then got hit and ball popped out..to me that should be a catch and fumble..i dont think that should be an int against Romo...jmo. thoughts?..

a football move will always be re defined.

 

[theogt]

That shouldn't have been an INT. The league has gone bananas over what is and isn't a catch. It's basically non-sensical at this point.

 

[AdamJT13]

It could be reviewed and changed to a catch and a fumble. But given the utter lack of clarity about what is a catch, who knows whether they will say it was a catch and fumble or an interception.

 

[northernvacowboysfan]

I look at it like this..if the ball was not caught by a Giants player and hit the ground, would the refs say incomplete or fumble?? Imo they would have called fumble, expecially if the Giants recovered it

 

[btcutter]

???? Who cares ??? We won the fricking game and those WR's better hang on to the ball rest of the year.