BourbonBalz
Star4Ever
- Messages
- 12,207
- Reaction score
- 8,178
Tell that to John Jurkovic.
You're talking about a playoff game against the Peckers. Nothing dirty, just *** kicking physical.
Tell that to John Jurkovic.
Did I miss something? We are comparing Martin with Larry Allen?
Yeah, like Martin rookie year vs. Allen rookie year. Did you have trouble understanding the clear-as-daylight thread title or thread body?
Saw all that, understood all that, ... like I said, Martin -vs- Allen?
You're talking about a playoff game against the Peckers. Nothing dirty, just *** kicking physical.
That was a **** play.... He dove at him from behind. Changed my opinion about Williams instantly.
No, their rookie years are not the same. Larry Allen was physically stronger then virtually anybody he played. He was also faster and quicker. He was not as technically sound as Martin is right now. Martin is a superior OL in that regard, at similar stages of their careers but Martin does have trouble, at times, against DLs who get their hands on him and just physically move him. That was not Allen. They are different players with different skills and weaknesses.
You spelled Smith wrong.
It wasn't illegal at the time (it is now) but it wasn't William's finest moment.
I could have sworn Larry Allen had to come into the SF NFC Champ and really struggled. I was pretty young so maybe confused.
No sacrilege intended. I don't remember much about the early year(s) of Larry Allen. I don't recall him starting as a rookie early or getting playing time until an injury on the line or something. Memory isn't too clear on his early days as a Cowboy. Zach Martin sure looks dominant out there. Anyone remember Larry Allen's first year or two? I wonder how Martin compares. Would it be fair to say Martin is more polished and refined in technique than Allen but not as strong in their rookie years.
I'm interested in rookie and second year comparisons of Martin and Allen. Yes, Allen was the most dominant OL ever. We all know that.