CouchCoach
Staff member
- Messages
- 41,122
- Reaction score
- 74,970
I see comments about the run game about a team that passed the ball 61% of the time in 2021.
The owner gave the QB a 40m x 4 contract to hand the ball off? He paid that RB when he thought they were a running team, they are not.
The OC and HC are known as passing coaches. Some feel neither can pass as a coach but they are there regardless.
The owner is a follow the ball GM and favors the excitement of the passing game and the entertainment value of that. I cannot argue with that, I think most would rather see passing and acrobatic catches than runs and defense.
So, they tag Schultz and some are surprised by that? He was a favorite target of the QB and the owner remembers what happened when Aikman lost Novacek.
If that surprised you, what are you going to be like if they go for a WR in the first? Think they won't?
This team is all about weaponizing the offense and QB. The owner looks at it as insurance on his 160M investment.
And don't think he isn't looking at that Rams model with Kupp, Woods, Jefferson and Beckham returning and that GB model with Adams and then? Makes what Rodgers did with one WR even more amazing.
So, this gets a lot easier if you just accept what this is and not what you want it to be. Gone are those days of 55% run with Emmitt and not to return.
This is a passing team and that is just what the owner wants it to be so all decisions flow from that one fact.
I look at this as a positive, at least that's an identity. Might not be the one I want but it is one the team can understand. I do not think that 61% passing was an anomaly, I think it will be closer to 65% this season.
The owner gave the QB a 40m x 4 contract to hand the ball off? He paid that RB when he thought they were a running team, they are not.
The OC and HC are known as passing coaches. Some feel neither can pass as a coach but they are there regardless.
The owner is a follow the ball GM and favors the excitement of the passing game and the entertainment value of that. I cannot argue with that, I think most would rather see passing and acrobatic catches than runs and defense.
So, they tag Schultz and some are surprised by that? He was a favorite target of the QB and the owner remembers what happened when Aikman lost Novacek.
If that surprised you, what are you going to be like if they go for a WR in the first? Think they won't?
This team is all about weaponizing the offense and QB. The owner looks at it as insurance on his 160M investment.
And don't think he isn't looking at that Rams model with Kupp, Woods, Jefferson and Beckham returning and that GB model with Adams and then? Makes what Rodgers did with one WR even more amazing.
So, this gets a lot easier if you just accept what this is and not what you want it to be. Gone are those days of 55% run with Emmitt and not to return.
This is a passing team and that is just what the owner wants it to be so all decisions flow from that one fact.
I look at this as a positive, at least that's an identity. Might not be the one I want but it is one the team can understand. I do not think that 61% passing was an anomaly, I think it will be closer to 65% this season.

