Rumor: supposedly cowboys going to look at adding a punt returner!

mldardy;3014086 said:
Yes. How many receivers have put up 250 yards? How many put up back to back 250 yards? I could probably can't on one maybe two hands in the history of the league. If Crayton puts up 250 then yes he should start but he hasn't and more than likely won't. Your coming up with a lot of what ifs for something that doesn't happen very often.

Your example of Bennett replacing Witten is silly. Crayton isn't even close to the track record Witten has in this league. What has Crayton done to have the respect of whether he should start or not.


Neither has Bennet, but the poster says you play who's hot, and Bennett could get hot due to the fact, teams focus on Witten. Teams focused on Crayton and Austin slipped in and made the most of a few bad tackles and everyone is screaming for it.

The Chiefs made some poor tackles and Austin went wild with it. its great to do, but you cant count another well defense, I dont know, BRONCOS would make those tackles and treat Austin like a pedistrian WR. Which i believe everyone was calling him a JAG before the game.
 
ddh33;3014095 said:
DId Cletis Gordon return punts in San Diego a little bit?


Is he on the team? Can he do PR? I think he can call Fair Catch or run a few yards too
 
Put Jerry back there to return punts, and hope he gets KILLED. All Cowboys problems solved. :laugh2:
 
ShiningStar;3014101 said:
Is he on the team? Can he do PR? I think he can call Fair Catch or run a few yards too

Yes, he's on the team. And I found that he has returned some punts earlier in his career. His stats are nothing special though. I just remember him always being #2 or 3 on the Chargers depth chart at PR and KR.
 
ddh33;3014114 said:
Yes, he's on the team. And I found that he has returned some punts earlier in his career. His stats are nothing special though. I just remember him always being #2 or 3 on the Chargers depth chart at PR and KR.


I say let him compete for the job.
 
DallasKnight;3014070 said:
That's exactly what I'm saying. You KNOW what you have in Crayton. Solid, nothing flashy, can usually count on him. What do you know about Austin. He had ONE game in which he blew the roof off the stadium. Was the goat the week before, and was none existant the rest of the season and last year. Hmmmm, yeah, I'll go with the guy I know for now, till Austin proves it wasn't a fluke.
Those that think that way have it assbackwards. We don't know what we have in Austin until we give him starters snaps and reps. What if Roy wasn't hurt, we still wouldn't know a thing about Austin. Right now we at least know he might be an answer at the #2. How about we find out?
 
ddh33;3014114 said:
Yes, he's on the team. And I found that he has returned some punts earlier in his career. His stats are nothing special though. I just remember him always being #2 or 3 on the Chargers depth chart at PR and KR.

He was released to clear room for Rossum.
 
speedkilz88;3014379 said:
Those that think that way have it assbackwards. We don't know what we have in Austin until we give him starters snaps and reps. What if Roy wasn't hurt, we still wouldn't know a thing about Austin. Right now we at least know he might be an answer at the #2. How about we find out?


You put him in, when we put 3 recievers on the field, and put Crayton in the slot a few times. Then actually throw to him. But if you start him over the established starter, make him the #2 for one games stats, what are you telling the rest of the club?

If that is your thinking, why isn't Victor Butler starting? (I'd actually like to see him play a few more snaps a game to see what he's got, but not start.) Maybe they aren't comfortable with his experience?

Maybe they are worried that Austin will turn in, instead of turning out and letting the DB/CB get a pick maybe?
 
DallasKnight;3014597 said:
You put him in, when we put 3 recievers on the field, and put Crayton in the slot a few times. Then actually throw to him. But if you start him over the established starter, make him the #2 for one games stats, what are you telling the rest of the club?

If that is your thinking, why isn't Victor Butler starting? (I'd actually like to see him play a few more snaps a game to see what he's got, but not start.) Maybe they aren't comfortable with his experience?

Maybe they are worried that Austin will turn in, instead of turning out and letting the DB/CB get a pick maybe?


You're still hanging on that one play but would it enlighten you to know that it's come out from sources in the team that Romo made the wrong read on that play? There was an article on it; Galloway's sources told him that; Nick Eatman on the lunch break said he also spoke with 2 sources who said that was the case.

What you're failing to understand is that this isn't an overreaction to one game by Austin but actually what we've been grooming him for and expecting out of him. He was one of the main reasons we let TO go. By the Arizona game last year, he was splitting NO.2 reps with Crayton, up until he got injured. This is almost like the Spencer/Ellis situation. It's the inevitable.

We've seen Crayton on the field and we know what we get. He does most of his work in the slot anyways. From Austin, at least we know he has the potential for the big play. Sure, we're gonna have to work through some inconsistencies but that's what you get with young WRs. You also get big plays. Guess which other 6'3, big, strong fast, big play WR was inconsistent in catching the ball and running routes? Yeah, TO. Austin is a great kid with a great attitude.

As to why not leave him in at number 3? Because we actually want him on the field together with Roy on downs where we are trying to run the ball. He makes the defense more honest and spaces the field better. And if not, defense would have to take their chances with one on one coverage on him or Roy. Add that to the fact that he's playing on a tender and we need to see what we have in him. Crayton isn't the future; we know that. Austin may or may not be but we have to see.

Here's a 24 year old, 6'3 215 lbs WR, 4.4 speed and 40 inch vertical with good hands, a great work ethic and a great attitude. I say you look at him like a first round pick who knows our system. He, Romo, Roy, Choice, Felix, Barber, Witten and Bennett are all young and can be the staple of our offense for years to come.
 
Four Words: Johnnie Lee Higgins Jr.

Why not, Oakland isn't using him and frankly, they have no need for WRs anyway
 
InmanRoshi;3014527 said:
He was released to clear room for Rossum.

lol...I wrote that just a few minutes (hours?) before he wasn't.

I wonder if they'll try to put Gordon on the practice squad, or if they feel better about their secondary with some guys getting healthy again?
 
Austin is better than Roy, neither are the type of WRs you can expect much v. Super Bowl contenders... AGAIN, 1 catch for both of them v. the Gs!
 
ShiningStar;3014069 said:
Hey hey hey, its all about popularity with the AP, Crayton has been Crayton and thats all thats asked of him. Sure he dropped some crucial throws, or isnt fast enough, or slick enough (see the punter direct him off the field) but hes been a Crayton type player and has a made a great living off it, so i dont expect "all pro" out of him, as long as hes stable and makes a catch or fair catch or two, life is dull but meaningful.


"All Pro" and "Pro Bowl" are not the same. The Pro Bowl is the one people call the popularity contest.
 
bootyhunta;3014001 said:
Did you see his muffed punt that cost Bills the game this week?

Parrish is a game changer in the special teams dept. Being from Buffalo, I see a lot of him, and one muffed punt does not define his career in any sense. He is fast, has excellent vision, and would be a huge upgrade over what we have. I know we got Rossum, just saying......
 

Forum statistics

Threads
465,932
Messages
13,905,898
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top