Garrett’s job is not player retention or acquisition.
Here's the thing.......Leary was good, damn good. Did we really think we replace his performance with a player whose never play G at NFL level and retain the same standards? Green/Cooper is huge drop-off and it's showing. That's on Garrett.....
True but it is his job to his players' talent level. I have a hard time believing Green best position for this unit is G. What's crazy is, Chaz Green the RT, is a solid player. His biggest issue was he couldn't stay on the field. Green the G is going through a learning curve. Remember Cooper saying right before the season started he was still trying to get all his keys down w/o making any mistakes. Think about that for a second.......Cooper has played the G position entire career. Imagine how much Green head is spinning playing the position for the first time ( in NFL ). I know the unit may need more time but ............
They promised Collins an opportunity at tackle to get him here. It's why he's playing there unfortunately. Tricky situation to handle.True but it is his job to his players' talent level. I have a hard time believing Green best position for this unit is G. What's crazy is, Chaz Green the RT, is a solid player. His biggest issue was he couldn't stay on the field. Green the G is going through a learning curve. Remember Cooper saying right before the season started he was still trying to get all his keys down w/o making any mistakes. Think about that for a second.......Cooper has played the G position entire career. Imagine how much Green head is spinning playing the position for the first time ( in NFL ). I know the unit may need more time but ............
Montgomery doesn't get that many carries and the Packers are usually spread out offensively, so when Montgomery does run the ball, it's more likely to be in obvious run situations with an extra defender.
What's more revealing are that guys who do get a lot of carries (Fournette, Ajayi, Miller, Freeman, and McCoy) have been running into more +1 boxes than Zeke has.
They're 3-1, but their intermedite-to-deep passing game has really struggled.I'm bit surprised about Freeman with the Falcons' potent passing game.
Here's the thing.......Leary was good, damn good. Did we really think we replace his performance with a player whose never play G at NFL level and retain the same standards? Green/Cooper is huge drop-off and it's showing. That's on Garrett.....
Wow that Kareem hunt looks good on both sides of the chart. demarco Murray looks good too!Elliott on 1st down
2016 5.5 ypc
2017 2.8 ypc
Elliott on 1st and 2nd down
2016 5.3 ypc
2017 3.4 ypc
The above stats are mine, from Pro Football Reference. The next two are from Adam Spinks@TheRBScout. In this first one, he determines the point (relative to the LOS) at which a defender is in tackling position. The players on the left have had the most running room. On the right are the players who have gained the most yards after this point.
In this next one, Spinks counts box defenders, but rather than simply listing those times when there was a certain number (8 in the box, for example), he takes offensive personnel into account and only lists those times when there was an extra defender in the box relative to the number of blockers. According to Spinks, on 62% of Elliott's runs in the first four games, Dallas had at least as many blockers as there were box defenders.
Wow...so all this stacked against the run is nonsense. We have adequate personnel to block the defendersElliott on 1st down
2016 5.5 ypc
2017 2.8 ypc
Elliott on 1st and 2nd down
2016 5.3 ypc
2017 3.4 ypc
The above stats are mine, from Pro Football Reference. The next two are from Adam Spinks@TheRBScout. In this first one, he determines the point (relative to the LOS) at which a defender is in tackling position. The players on the left have had the most running room. On the right are the players who have gained the most yards after this point.
In this next one, Spinks counts box defenders, but rather than simply listing those times when there was a certain number (8 in the box, for example), he takes offensive personnel into account and only lists those times when there was an extra defender in the box relative to the number of blockers. According to Spinks, on 62% of Elliott's runs in the first four games, Dallas had at least as many blockers as there were box defenders.
Wow...so all this stacked against the run is nonsense. We gave adewpquate personnel to block the defenders
Elliott on 1st down
2016 5.5 ypc
2017 2.8 ypc
Elliott on 1st and 2nd down
2016 5.3 ypc
2017 3.4 ypc
The above stats are mine, from Pro Football Reference. The next two are from Adam Spinks@TheRBScout. In this first one, he determines the point (relative to the LOS) at which a defender is in tackling position. The players on the left have had the most running room. On the right are the players who have gained the most yards after this point.
In this next one, Spinks counts box defenders, but rather than simply listing those times when there was a certain number (8 in the box, for example), he takes offensive personnel into account and only lists those times when there was an extra defender in the box relative to the number of blockers. According to Spinks, on 62% of Elliott's runs in the first four games, Dallas had at least as many blockers as there were box defenders.
like i keep telling the people blaming Garrett and Jerry and Linehan and scheme
this is the reason we are not rolling yet on offense
defense is a whole other story
Mine too. Filter out players like Montgomery who don't have a lot of carries.My guess is that when Montgomery does run that defenses know he's going to run.
Nothing short of a religious conversion would make the other Adam focus on the running game.Adam Spinks with those stats huh...Hmmm a guy named Adam who is a master with stats. Could it be?