S.I. on Switizer blurb article is good

mmillman

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,153
Reaction score
35
Switzer's attitude was that if you had the best players and assistant coaches, you had the best chance for success -- period. As he said on Tuesday, "Do you think there's any mystery why I won and guys like [Steve] Spurrier didn't? Spurrier didn't have the players in Washington. Neither does Gibbs the second time around, and neither did [Bill] Parcells in Dallas. Not like Jimmy and I did."
This philosophy is so contrary to what we're taught to believe -- to what most coaches insist that we believe -- that is seems crazy. Whether or not you buy into it, you have to concede this: It refreshingly gives credit to the men who play the game, rather than to the control freak wearing the headset.
Consider Switzer's reaction when the two-time defending champion Cowboys, in his first year as coach, fell into a quick 21-0 hole to the 49ers during the 1994 NFC Championship game in San Francisco: "I gathered the players on the sidelines and said, 'What is a coach supposed to say to a team that's down 21-0 five minutes into the game?' They stared back at me, and I yelled, 'At least we've got 55 minutes to get back in this sum*****!'"
For the record, the Cowboys nearly did before losing, 38-28. The defeat, naturally, was roundly blamed on their head coach, who to this day doesn't dispute that he was at least partially culpable. "We should have been more conservative before halftime -- that's my fault," he said Tuesday as we arrived at the home of his daughter, Kathy, just around the corner from Doug's. (Barry's third son, Greg, a songwriter, lives in Nashville with his wife and two children).
 

Colo

Rocky Mountain High
Messages
809
Reaction score
11
mmillman;1441081 said:
Switzer's attitude was that if you had the best players and assistant coaches, you had the best chance for success -- period.

Not sure how this is considered revolutionary thinking. Switzer should have said having the best players and assistant coaches was his ONLY chance for success.
 

SultanOfSix

Star Power
Messages
12,957
Reaction score
8,174
Switzer also said that coaching is the most underrated and most overrated profession in sports, or something along those lines.

The gist of that message is more true than what he says in the statement above. Yes, if you have outstanding talent, the chances are greater that your team will win. However, if you have horrid coaching, that's not going to help at all, regardless how talented your players are.

Switzer got more blame than he deserved for the '94 championship game. However, he didn't do much to help either.
 

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
Barry is right based on his examples. It is obvious that the teams with the best players win a majority of the games. The coaching comes into play when both teams have equal to near equal talent. That occurs in the playoffs. That is when a very good coach and good assistant coaches can make a difference and give one team an edge.

Barry and Jimmy coached Cowboys teams that just had better players than most teams. Spurrier coached teams that did not have as much talent while at Washington. He still may not have been a good coach if given talent, but the Skins were not talented. Parcells' team in Dallas were not overflowing with talent. I do think they lost too many games against teams that were only equal in talent to them under Parcells. It got annoying when that happened.
 

Chocolate Lab

Run-loving Dino
Messages
37,107
Reaction score
11,452
That's one reason Switzer is so likeable. He always deflects his accomplishments to his players.

Jimmy, as great a coach as he was for us, never disputed the claims that he was some kind of genius... And in fact, he even went out of his way at times to perpetuate that idea.

Barry never cared about any of that. He's never minded admitting that better players usually win games.
 

philo beddoe

Benched
Messages
1,895
Reaction score
0
mmillman;1441081 said:
Switzer's attitude was that if you had the best players and assistant coaches, you had the best chance for success -- period. As he said on Tuesday, "Do you think there's any mystery why I won and guys like [Steve] Spurrier didn't? Spurrier didn't have the players in Washington. Neither does Gibbs the second time around, and neither did [Bill] Parcells in Dallas. Not like Jimmy and I did."
This philosophy is so contrary to what we're taught to believe -- to what most coaches insist that we believe -- that is seems crazy. Whether or not you buy into it, you have to concede this: It refreshingly gives credit to the men who play the game, rather than to the control freak wearing the headset.
Consider Switzer's reaction when the two-time defending champion Cowboys, in his first year as coach, fell into a quick 21-0 hole to the 49ers during the 1994 NFC Championship game in San Francisco: "I gathered the players on the sidelines and said, 'What is a coach supposed to say to a team that's down 21-0 five minutes into the game?' They stared back at me, and I yelled, 'At least we've got 55 minutes to get back in this sum*****!'"
For the record, the Cowboys nearly did before losing, 38-28. The defeat, naturally, was roundly blamed on their head coach, who to this day doesn't dispute that he was at least partially culpable. "We should have been more conservative before halftime -- that's my fault," he said Tuesday as we arrived at the home of his daughter, Kathy, just around the corner from Doug's. (Barry's third son, Greg, a songwriter, lives in Nashville with his wife and two children).
I love Barry Switzer. The guy is the greatest. Larger than life. What a character.:)
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
philo beddoe;1441115 said:
I love Barry Switzer. The guy is the greatest. Larger than life. What a character.:)

Yeah, but he still cheated in 76 with the spies at closed practices. Coach Royal wasn't wrong about that. You ask Switzer today bout that and he just smiles.
 

philo beddoe

Benched
Messages
1,895
Reaction score
0
ABQCOWBOY;1441140 said:
Yeah, but he still cheated in 76 with the spies at closed practices. Coach Royal wasn't wrong about that. You ask Switzer today bout that and he just smiles.
LOL. The conspriracy theory lives!!!! Royal was PARANOID.:lmao2:
 

ABQCOWBOY

Regular Joe....
Messages
58,929
Reaction score
27,716
philo beddoe;1441142 said:
LOL. The conspriracy theory lives!!!! Royal was PARANOID.:lmao2:

Yeah, he probably was, but he was still right. You know it too Philo. Hey, in the Red River, all is fair. Ask no quarter, give none is how I've always looked at that deal. Having said that, you know as well as I do that Switzer did it. Switzer knows too. I don't see why it's a big deal to admit it. Switzer is gone, Coach Royal is gone, the legacy lives on. He should just admit it once and for all and be done with it.

That way, we can get on with the business of future conspiracies.
 

philo beddoe

Benched
Messages
1,895
Reaction score
0
ABQCOWBOY;1441170 said:
Yeah, he probably was, but he was still right. You know it too Philo. Hey, in the Red River, all is fair. Ask no quarter, give none is how I've always looked at that deal. Having said that, you know as well as I do that Switzer did it. Switzer knows too. I don't see why it's a big deal to admit it. Switzer is gone, Coach Royal is gone, the legacy lives on. He should just admit it once and for all and be done with it.

That way, we can get on with the business of future conspiracies.
Never happened. They didn't need to do such things. Excuse making.:)
 

Dallas

Old bulletproof tiger
Messages
11,515
Reaction score
3
Yeagermeister;1441228 said:
Switzer is and was an idiot.

That's all I have to say about that.


SHUT UP !!!! :rolleyes: Freakin go eat some more bran-flakes.
 

Concord

Mr. Buckeye
Messages
12,825
Reaction score
119
Yeagermeister;1441228 said:
Switzer is and was an idiot.

That's all I have to say about that.

Tom-Hanks---Forrest-Gump--C10101871.jpeg


:D
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,684
Reaction score
18,036
Yeagermeister;1441228 said:
Switzer is and was an idiot.

That's all I have to say about that.

But in the end, the "idiot" has a couple of collegiate championships and a Super Bowl ring.

And you have . . . .?

That is what I thought.

:)
 

AsthmaField

Outta bounds
Messages
26,489
Reaction score
44,544
The talented team usually does win. However, if you have two teams that are pretty evenly matched, then coaching can make all the difference in the world.

For example, the 1994 NFC Championship game between Dallas and SF. Both were good teams (I think we were a little better) and I think coaching made the difference in that game.

Last years AFC playoff game between San Diego and New England. I think coaching might've made the difference in that game as well.

In both instances, the most talented teams lost, IMO, and coaching was a big difference. In New England's case, I also think Tom Brady made a big difference as well, so you might could say it wasn't all coaching in that example.

Anyway, coaching does matter... but talent matters more in that talent will usually win in most cases.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
GimmeTheBall!;1441290 said:
But in the end, the "idiot" has a couple of collegiate championships and a Super Bowl ring.

And you have . . . .?

That is what I thought.

:)

I am a mod on CZ.......I win :yourock:
 
Top