DFWJC
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 59,850
- Reaction score
- 48,644
Yes.
He’s making the point (and it’s valid) that Seattle will have had a winning record when the Cowboys beat them. The Jets were 1-0 when the Cowboys beat them.
Yes.
He’s making the point (and it’s valid) that Seattle will have had a winning record when the Cowboys beat them. The Jets were 1-0 when the Cowboys beat them.
The Jets were 1-0 when we beat them but they’re currently sub 500 and aren’t a legit contender.In that case, the Seahawks would be the second team with a winning record the Cowboys have beaten.
No, but they fit your criteria.The Jets were 1-0 when we beat them but they’re currently sub 500 and aren’t a legit contender.
I clarified it for you. We haven’t beaten a team that currently has a winning record, that’s what I was referring to. We beat the Giants in the opener and they didn’t have a losing record at the time.No, but they fit your criteria.
Trying to show that they can do it better than we do?Shotgun handoff on 4th and short. Why do teams keeping doing it?
They gonna be tough. Their season on the line.We better beat Seattle....that was pathetic.
their schedule is brutal. We need to take care of business.They gonna be tough. Their season on the line.
Smith Lockett and Charbonet are okay but they do not have the production or the defense to compete with the Shanahan's steamroller offense.Seattle is so dumb. Time for Pete to retire.