SB with Wade hypothtical

TheDude

McLovin
Messages
12,575
Reaction score
11,197
Would you have taken a SB win with Wade in 2007 if it meant he got 5 years regardless?

Would it have been a Switzer thing or woukld the team be tougher?

I'd roll with winning breeding new attitudes-shocking because I wanted Phillips out in 08
 
Yes, because it would mean 6 before Pittsburgh.

I just threw up in my mouth.
 
The more we move away from 2007, the bigger that dissapointment seems to me.
 
McLovin;3658398 said:
Would you have taken a SB win with Wade in 2007 if it meant he got 5 years regardless?

Would it have been a Switzer thing or woukld the team be tougher?

I'd roll with winning breeding new attitudes-shocking because I wanted Phillips out in 08

So the question is, would I take a SB win with Wade in 2007 if we would suck for the next 5 years???


Hell yea I would have, a ring is a ring is a ring.



Of course this is just a fairy tale, like Wade could ever coach a team to the SB.:rolleyes:
 
Beast_from_East;3658683 said:
So the question is, would I take a SB win with Wade in 2007 if we would suck for the next 5 years???


Hell yea I would have, a ring is a ring is a ring.



Of course this is just a fairy tale, like Wade could ever coach a team to the SB.:rolleyes:
He couldn't coach his way out of a wet paper bag.
 
I never thought with a 1-5 record we'd be reaching this bad for topics.
 
well.....considering we didnt win a SB in 07 and still had him for 3 more seasons.....your really asking if we would take him for two more seasons for that ring and i say .... absolutely
 
Hostile;3658400 said:
Yes, because it would mean 6 before Pittsburgh.

I just threw up in my mouth.


Well I would simply cause it would mean six. I'm not even thinking before Pittsburgh just in the fact that Superbowls are hard to come by so if we could have had 1 in 2007, even with it meaning that Wade would have gotten an extra 5-7 years here I'd have taken it in a heartbeat and been very satisfied by the decision.
 
Back
Top