News: Scouting The Schedule: Giants Added Key Pieces In Free Agency & The Draft

CCBoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,005
Reaction score
22,604
Scouting The Schedule: Giants Added Key Pieces In Free Agency & The Draft
http://www.dallascowboys.com/news/2...ule-giants-added-key-pieces-free-agency-draft




...Best Draft Pick: The Giants’ front office and coaching staff wants to use Evan Engram as a true inline tight end, which is something he has never done. He’s a much better player when he can play in the slot or wide. The draft pick I like the best is Dalvin Tomlinson, the defensive tackle from Alabama. The Giants let Jonathan Hankins walk in the offseason, which left a huge hole inside. Hankins was a load to have to handle, and, paired with Damon Harrison, he was difficult to move. Tomlinson gives them that heavy player inside to defend the run, but he also can give them pass rush ability. Great get for the Giants there in the second round.

Best Free Agency Move: It will be interesting if D.J. Fluker can win the starting job over Bobby Hart at right tackle. The Chargers let Fluker walk, and that’s usually not a good sign when a club just moves on from an offensive lineman. The Giants have a need there, but the move I like the best is the signing of Brandon Marshall. With Marshall you have to take the good with the bad -- but he’s been productive everywhere he has been. A cold weather receiver that has a tendency to come up with some clutch catches. I have always respected his toughness and willingness to be a complete player. He will play opposite Odell Beckham Jr., while Sterling Shepard will line up in the slot.

Most Troublesome Matchup: Landon Collins has developed into one of the better safeties in the league. His ability to play low and help in the running game takes away from what the Cowboys like to do – pound the ball. Collins is like an extra linebacker in their scheme, preventing the big play. Collins has also bucked the trend of Alabama safeties that struggle to play coverage, which makes him even more difficult to deal with. Defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo is not afraid to line him up in the slot or on the outside because he knows that he’s not a liability in those situations.

Most Favorable Matchup: I was surprised that the Giants didn’t address their offensive line in the draft until the sixth round, when they had several tackle and guard options on the board. If there is a matchup that opponents have taken advantage of, it is left tackle Ereck Flowers. The problem for the Giants with Flowers is that he’s not developed to the point where there is any consistency to his game. He could play well for three to four plays, then be awful for the next three to four plays. When you see Eli Manning take hits during the game, it’s usually Flowers’ man...
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
The Giants had a solid offseason. Where they lack they can compensate , where they are strong they know how to use to their advantage. Good off season, the rest is up to their coaches to use it wisely like they did last year.
 

reddyuta

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,513
Reaction score
17,235
Tomlinson is really good against the run,he is a good replacement for Hankins.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
Their biggest need was OL & RB and they didn't address either one.

their biggest need on paper is that, they didnt need it to beat us, nor to get into the playoffs. So, would you make that priority number 1? I dont feel its anything that hurt them.
 

ThreeandOut

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,873
Reaction score
4,213
I think you could make the case that a lot of the moves the Cowboys made in the draft were to better match up with the Giants.

The Giants OL is poor but Dallas didn't really seem to take advantage last year. Hopefully, the additions to the DL will help with that.

Eli will throw a lot of picks but the DB's we had last year had issues catching the ball. The new DB's might actually catch some of Eli's errant throws.

The Giants seemed to have the unique ability last year to contain Zeke, covers our outside receivers and pressure Dak. Maybe the solution is to have two quick, elusive receivers like Beasley and Switzer get open quickly in the short passing game.
 

LOBO7

Well-Known Member
Messages
603
Reaction score
502
their biggest need on paper is that, they didnt need it to beat us, nor to get into the playoffs. So, would you make that priority number 1? I dont feel its anything that hurt them.

They got away with it last year. That's crazy to think it will play out that way again. Never make it through the playoffs if Manning is neturalized by a team that can bring pressure.
 

JoeKing

Diehard
Messages
36,645
Reaction score
31,938
The giants have a huge chink in their armor, their O-line is going to get Eli killed. :D
 

sideon

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,933
Reaction score
1,958
their biggest need on paper is that, they didnt need it to beat us, nor to get into the playoffs. So, would you make that priority number 1? I dont feel its anything that hurt them.
And they couldn't make it further in the playoffs because of it, your logic is flawed because you assume that they will have the same success without addressing key needs.
 

UTmodisette

Well-Known Member
Messages
208
Reaction score
309
Tomlinson is really good against the run,he is a good replacement for Hankins.
He can't pass rush though, I didn't understand that pick. I guess they are just building their team to stop the Cowboys running game, because it doesn't make sense against the rest of the NFL. They needed to go after a 3tech who can rush the passer, and instead they went after someone who is arguably worse at that than Hankins.

I thought they had the worst draft of the NFC East. They got a tight end who is more of a Jimmy Graham type who needs to be an inline guy, and in their offense they plan on using him as a traditional tightend, and we have seen how that hurt Graham's value in Seattle. Then they draft another run stopping DT for a team that needs pass rush. Then they get a developmental QB in the 3rd round which I understand, but he seems like just another Nick Foles to me. It took until their 4th and 5th round picks to address running back and pass rush, 2 of their top needs. And they didn't address the Oline until the 6th round, by far their biggest weakness. Just a confusing draft to me.
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
OL was a big need for them, but it was a really bad OL draft. Fluker will help, but having OL trouble is a big deal for them.

The Ellison signing was a good move. Not as big a fan of the Marshall signing for them as most seem to be. He's old, a headache, and nagging injuries slowed him down last year. They have other good WRs they can hurt you with already.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
They got away with it last year. That's crazy to think it will play out that way again. Never make it through the playoffs if Manning is neturalized by a team that can bring pressure.

Records dont go by "would of" "could of" or "gotten away with" They were 11-5 with a one and done, we were 13-3 and one and done as far as the league goes, its the same thing. Doesnt matter what the rest think or can analyze, the end of the day in the league is your record. Everything else is just that.

And if they got away with it at 11-5 than Dallas did the same thing at 13-3.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
And they couldn't make it further in the playoffs because of it, your logic is flawed because you assume that they will have the same success without addressing key needs.

and Dallas will have more success why? Even if you fill your "needs" what if that player doesnt produce? Injuries occur as well. So many factors go into it that its absurd to say one team will and one team wont. You dont know if Dallas draft craps out or blazes.

Giants make it work because their coaches also make it work, thats why they do more with less and Dallas is stuck with the same excuses. They had a better defense, we had a better offense, guess what we finished at the same place.

Your logic is just as flawed because you cant predict what will be. I can nit pick it all day, what will that get us?
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,559
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
The Giants had a solid offseason.

They failed to fill their biggest needs. That's not "solid".

Where they lack they can compensate , where they are strong they know how to use to their advantage.

Yeah, who needs players, right? They can "compensate", just because they want to really, really bad...
:rolleyes:

Good off season, the rest is up to their coaches to use it wisely like they did last year.

Not filling your biggest needs doesn't equal a "good offseason". And continuing to press your luck relying on an aging quarterback to stay healthy despite taking more and more hits will eventually catch up to you.

Take that from a team that knows.
 

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,517
Reaction score
7,746
They failed to fill their biggest needs. That's not "solid".



Yeah, who needs players, right? They can "compensate", just because they want to really, really bad...
:rolleyes:



Not filling your biggest needs doesn't equal a "good offseason". And continuing to press your luck relying on an aging quarterback to stay healthy despite taking more and more hits will eventually catch up to you.

Take that from a team that knows.


11-5 with all these "needs" ill take that any season.

Nice try tho. If 11-5 with "needs" is hard, how did Dallas do 13-3? Both ended at the same place. So what went wrong with Dallas? What record goes with "needs"? I would have to say 11-5 and making the playoffs, i think you compensated for your needs. And yes they did have a solid offseason. I also stated Garrett had one of his best off seasons. What of it? It doesnt mean squat right now, but im not going to bash the Giants because they didnt fill needs that really didnt affect as the same a 13-3 team with HFA who went as far.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,834
Reaction score
103,559
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
11-5 with all these "needs" ill take that any season.

As compared to 13-3? Great "math" there...

Nice try tho.

When you can't handle simple math, I don't need to "try". You keep slobbering all over 11-5, I'll take 13-3.

If 11-5 with "needs" is hard, how did Dallas do 13-3? Both ended at the same place. So what went wrong with Dallas? What record goes with "needs"? I would have to say 11-5 and making the playoffs, i think you compensated for your needs.

They were among the very worst in the league in offensive points at 310, worst in the division by far, and 110 points off of Dallas' pace. That's not "compensating", that's being carried by your defense.


And yes they did have a solid offseason.

No, they didn't. They upgraded positions that were already strong while failing to address their biggest needs.

I also stated Garrett had one of his best off seasons. What of it? It doesnt mean squat right now, but im not going to bash the Giants because they didnt fill needs that really didnt affect as the same a 13-3 team with HFA who went as far.

No, but you'll try to praise them for it?

:laugh:
 
Top