Scrimmage Stream/Discussion Thread

Really wanted to see Ryan Russell @ LDE....but they keep playing him @ 3DT......Don't like it

He is slow for a DE and not very athletic. However, he's really quick and agile for a DT.

Perhaps that's why they want him there. Just speculation.
 
There are so many issues there. They don't even cover the draft the way they used to. They didn't even have Geoff Swaim secret audio when the pick was made.

How the heck do you draft a Geoff Swaim and not cover it extensively?

Spaulding was probably busy using the video equipment.

Or Jerry was. Recording his version of girls gone wild.
 
Who's move? Dez's? For what?

Really, if I have to explain it to you.... it takes all the fun out.

That's assuming there was some actual fun there to begin with.

So, if Risen says something funny - and I'm not saying he can - explaining it to people would make it somehow less funny.
 
Guess Swaim is his new whipping boy. ......kinda like Hitchens last year until the games started and Hitchens stated making plays. Then silence

He wasn't silenced. Risen still rails on Hitchens and still doesn't think much of him.
Right RS? You no rikey da Hitch?
 
So......we gonna throw nothing but crossing patterns this year...:(

Probably the case. We don't have the back(s) on this roster to replicate what we did last season.

Especially if Beasley is going to play a bigger role. We probably will resemble the Pats offense last year. Periodic run but a lot of small ball in the passing game and receivers. Biggest difference will be the up top to Bryant from time to time.
 
There are so many issues there. They don't even cover the draft the way they used to. They didn't even have Geoff Swaim secret audio when the pick was made.

How the heck do you draft a Geoff Swaim and not cover it extensively?

I at least hope they interview Geoff Swaim after the game !!!
 
Really, if I have to explain it to you.... it takes all the fun out.

That's assuming there was some actual fun there to begin with.

So, if Risen says something funny - and I'm not saying he can - explaining it to people would make it somehow less funny.

Or if something not funny is said, explaining it does nothing but make your head nod sympathetically saying "I get what he was trying to do... I guess, poor guy".
 
Probably the case. We don't have the back(s) on this roster to replicate what we did last season.

Especially if Beasley is going to play a bigger role. We probably will resemble the Pats offense last year. Periodic run but a lot of small ball in the passing game and receivers. Biggest difference will be the up top to Bryant from time to time.

So our thought process is "Well, that worked...let's not do that again"?

We must run the ball.
 
Never said that, he could turn out to not even make the team but to talk junk about a guy before he gets a chance is stupid. Let's see what he has first

No, I am saying Geoff Swaim is a future All-Pro. I was not trying to say you said that, I like the guy.
 
Or if something not funny is said, explaining it does nothing but make your head nod sympathetically saying "I get what he was trying to do... I guess, poor guy".

giphy.gif


Pretty much like that.
 
So our thought process is "Well, that worked...let's not do that again"?

We must run the ball.

I didn't say it was my thought process.

But I can see it happening simply because of the dumpster fire at running back.

I do not think it will take much to abandon the run after it is not effective.
 
No, I am saying Geoff Swaim is a future All-Pro. I was not trying to say you said that, I like the guy.

I love Swaim. Every time I watch him he's doing something I thought he couldn't do as well as he does.
We'll see if that translates.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,639
Messages
13,823,819
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top