Seattle Times: T.O. versus Team Oriented

LaTunaNostra

He Made the Difference
Messages
14,985
Reaction score
4
Thursday, January 4, 2007 - Page updated at 12:00 AM

T.O. versus Team Oriented
By Jerry Brewer

Seattle Times staff columnist


Seattle spreads the ball more evenly among its receivers than Dallas.

They celebrate together. The Seahawks' wide receivers call it the Jump and Bump. It's just their version of a move many teams now use to express delight.

Run, leap, turn sideways and tap shoulders with a teammate. Consider it a twist on the chest bump.

"I guess it's a new-millennium high-five," Nate Burleson said. "You've got to run and get enough momentum to jump and finish with a shoulder bump. We can be 30 yards away, give a look or a point and know we're going up top."

These receivers do it at least once per quarter. And it's not just a one-on-one routine, either. Often, all five of them get in on it. They're so T.O.

Team-Oriented.

Spend a moment in appreciation before the hurricane hits. On Saturday, the Terrell Owens Cowboys (at least in No. 81's mind) visit for either a playoff game or a temper tantrum. It depends on how much pigskin Tony Romo feeds to the NFL's all-time leading narcissist.

Since counting cornerbacks takes so little time around here, count some blessings. Using Owens as contrast helps illuminate how wonderfully the Seahawks handled a receiver glut this season.

When Seattle traded a first-round pick to New England for Deion Branch, then sprinkled a $37 million contract on top, the dissension police went on patrol. This couldn't work, some thought. The Seahawks already had two quality starters in Darrell Jackson and Bobby Engram. They had just signed Burleson. They possessed a talented No. 4 option in D.J. Hackett. Why be greedy and risk bickering?

Though it was a reasonable concern, the players laughed. This was a character check.

"I wasn't offended," Burleson said of thoughts these receivers couldn't coexist. "It's a legit question when you're talking about pro athletes, dollar signs, playing time and statistics. Sometimes, pride and ego get in the way. But I knew the quality of people we have.

"I knew there wouldn't be any hating. You can see it's true by how the other guys react after somebody makes a big play."

Jump and Bump.

Branch laughed when asked about the celebration. The receivers do their thing, but they also like for the peppy Branch to dance alone. They make him, Branch says, which has led to some comical moments. Like when Branch scored against Oakland and broke out a little boogie called "The Motorcycle," in which you pretend you're fiddling with handlebars on a bike. He didn't exactly look like Yung Joc, the rapper who helped popularize the dance.

"Why does everybody else just get to bump and I've got to dance, too?" Branch asked, laughing.

Not all receiving units are created equal. For every Owens, there is a Branch, a big-name acquisition who understands the concept of blending in.

The Seahawks were able to live with five talented wideouts because the team genuinely welcomed Branch. Then Branch responded by being as professional and hard-working as advertised. It allowed Jackson, the most gifted of the receiving corps, not to feel threatened.

When it came time to use all the players, several factors helped them coexist. Most important, Jackson stood out, which stabilized the group and helped define roles. Before a toe injury, Jackson was on pace for his finest season since catching 87 passes in 2004.

Engram's thyroid condition played a role, too. While the team suffered for nine games without the steadying presence of their most dependable receiver, the illness also paved the way for the emergence of Hackett, who currently stands at the Seahawks' best receiver. His improvement was even more vital because Burleson struggled early in the season.

So the Seahawks wound up needing so much depth at receiver. With Jackson (toe) and Hackett (hip flexor) listed as questionable for Saturday, they must again lean on depth.

"That is still a strength on our team," coach Mike Holmgren said of his receivers.

Because of their own injuries and offensive-line woes and quarterback Matt Hasselbeck's knee problem, this was not an amazing year for the receivers. The five players accounted for 203 catches, 2,773 yards and 21 touchdowns.

But measure their impact against the Cowboys' group. Dallas ranked fifth in the NFL in passing yards this season, while Seattle lagged behind in 19th place. But the production from the Seahawks' receiving quintet looks good when measured against the production of the Cowboys' receivers (196 catches, 2,818 yards and 23 touchdowns).

The Cowboys use the classic approach. They have two 1,000-yard receivers — Owens and Terry Glenn — and fill in the blanks with Patrick Crayton and Sam Hurd.

But Owens' ego caused so many headaches you must wonder whether the Seahawks have a better situation. What the Seahawks lack in dynamo they make up for in dependability.

And they've so enjoyed sharing custody of their success. Offensive lineman Tom Ashworth gazed across the locker room to make that point.

"Look at them; they're a lot of fun," Ashworth said, staring at Branch and Burleson chuckling. "They're always having a great time together."


Jerry Brewer: 206-464-2277 or [email protected]


Spreading the wealth

Production among Seattle's five wide receivers is spread much more evenly than in Dallas, where Terrell Owens and Terry Glenn account for 79 percent of Cowboys wide receiver's catches and receiving yards and 83 percent of their touchdowns:

Seahawks

Player No. Yds Avg Lg TD

Darrell Jackson 63 956 15.2 72 10
Deion Branch 53 725 13.7 38 4
D.J. Hackett 45 610 13.6 47 4
Bobby Engram 24 290 12.1 25 1
Nate Burleson 18 192 10.7 36 2

Totals 203 2773 13.7 72 21

Cowboys

Player No. Yds Avg Lg TD

Terrell Owens 85 1180 13.9 56 13
Terry Glenn 70 1047 15.0 54 6
Patrick Crayton 36 516 14.3 53 4
Sam Hurd 5 75 15.0 33 0

Totals 196 2818 14.4 56 23

Source: NFL.com

Copyright The Seattle Times Company
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/seahawks/2003508609_brewer04.html
 
wt f is this crap? I see TO celebrating all the time w/ teammates when they score

and what temper-tantrum has he thrown on the sidelines? about as many as Tony Romo has
 
summerisfunner;1287811 said:
wt f is this crap? I see TO celebrating all the time w/ teammates when they score

and what temper-tantrum has he thrown on the sidelines? about as many as Tony Romo has
probablt the tantrum he threw at philly. but i woulda too
 
bigbadroy;1287815 said:
probablt the tantrum he threw at philly. but i woulda too

Getting missed by Bledsoe twice when you're wide open for TDs against your old team hurts.
 
GoinForSix;1287804 said:
Their tight end has 231 yards, ours has 754.

Yes, that was conveniently overlooked.

But the point is valid - there is more than one way to get 'production' and if Holmgren's way is via more equitable distribution, then all the more arduous the task for our dbacks.
 
LaTunaNostra;1287822 said:
Yes, that was conveniently overlooked.

But the point is valid - there is more than one way to get 'production' and if Holmgren's way is via more equitable distribution, then all the more arduous the task for our dbacks.

I totally agree, I'm scared to see what we're gonna do when they spread us out 4 wide.
 
GoinForSix;1287855 said:
I totally agree, I'm scared to see what we're gonna do when they spread us out 4 wide.

I think it was they had 28 first downs last week vs the Bucsand Hackett who was their big playmaker last week. And they are using Stevens effectively.


The good news is Darrell Jackson has turf toe and may not play. At least that was the last I saw on him.
 
Boyz_Romo-TO-bump.gif


Romo ran 50 yards to bump chests with TO on this play. And what about the countless times Sam Hurd has done it? This Seattle writer is ********.
 
This writer is trying to convince himself that the Seattle Wrs are as good as are, even if he has to make HUGE stretches to get there
 
BigDFan5;1287960 said:
This writer is trying to convince himself that the Seattle Wrs are as good as are, even if he has to make HUGE stretches to get there

They're not as good as ours.

But their system may prove superior.

I see their fans also acknowledging they will need a coordinated, efficient juggernaut. They're not expecting any one player to win it for them.

In the absence of a "superstar", can they win?

we shall see.
 
Boyzmamacita;1287878 said:
Boyz_Romo-TO-bump.gif


Romo ran 50 yards to bump chests with TO on this play. And what about the countless times Sam Hurd has done it? This Seattle writer is ********.

:hammer:
 
How ridiculous....the Cowboys also scored almost a touchdown a game more than Seattle and how much of that is related to the mere "threat" of T.O??
 
Boyzmamacita;1287878 said:
Boyz_Romo-TO-bump.gif


Romo ran 50 yards to bump chests with TO on this play. And what about the countless times Sam Hurd has done it? This Seattle writer is ********.

Yup!


  • TO runs WITH Julius on way to his TD against the Saints - very selfish
  • TO thanks/pumps up each O-lineman after scoring TD's against Atlanta
  • TO celebrates numerous times with Hurd and other players after he or they score
  • TO has blocked
  • TO has ran out to play centerfield safety on defense
  • TO has gone over to the defense more than once and pumped them up... tried anyways
  • TO donates ball to salvation army
  • He has said "we" MANY times about wins and losses
there are more... I am sure
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,230
Messages
13,859,540
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top