Duane;4616684 said:
Even the Mazda 3 & Impreza hatchbacks? They both seemed like they had a lot of storage space.
Rear leg room in the Mazda3 is 36.2 and 35.4 in the Impreza and cargo space is 17 and 22.5 cu.ft., respectively. In comparison, rear leg room is 38.3 in the Honda CR-V and and 39.3 in the Mazda CX-5, while cargo space is 65.4 cu.ft. in the CR-V and 70.9 cu.ft. in the CX-5.
The Mazda3 and the Impreza have the same size leg room in the back as our 2005 Toyota Corolla Sedan, which also has 13.6 cu.ft of cargo space. Putting a rear-facing car seat for our little girl in the Corolla is a tight fit. We have to lean the back for the driver or passenger seat forward some to accommodate it which makes driving or seating shotgun somewhat unpleasant.
Our 3 year old son is obviously in a front-facing car seat but he is at the stage where the edge of the car seat comes to his calves, which means that his legs are straightened out and up against the back of the front seats rather than bending at the knees. Its not very comfortable for him or whoever sits directly in the front of him because on long rides he gets restless and starts kicking his legs every now and then.
Cargo space in the Impreza and Mazda3 would be somewhat adequate if almost all the space in the back seat would not be taken by two car seats most of the time. So, almost every cargo we would carry for various reasons (i.e., a couple of suitcases, camping stuff, groceries, bulky items from Lowe's or Home Depot, etc...) will have to be able to fit comfortably in the cargo space. While the Impreza and Mazda3 are an upgrade over the Corolla, it is just not enough.