ScipioCowboy;4239103 said:He should absolutely play under the following conditions:
1) He can manage the pain.
2) The risk of injury is no greater than if the current injury were not present.
Star4Ever;4239115 said:I don't see any way he can tackle with a cast covering his entire hand. No way to wrap up. I would sit him.
REDVOLUTION;4239124 said:If he can breathe he should play.
They can do a bionic man on him is he needs to replace limbs in future![]()
peplaw06;4239135 said:I'm not worried about him being able to tackle with the cast. You can wrap up without your fingers.
He's definitely not going to be as effective in forcing or getting turnovers though. But I'll take him batting balls instead of making picks. I'm thinking he's definitely a lot better with a cast than a healthy Brooking.
lane;4239097 said:man...we need him in the worst way..
but..will he be effective with the injury?
thoughts?
i think he will be fine in pass coverage..but trying to tackle makes me uneasy.
ScipioCowboy;4239103 said:He should absolutely play under the following conditions:
1) He can manage the pain.
2) The risk of injury is no greater than if the current injury were not present.
dadymat;4239119 said:its nut up time....if this team wants the playoffs they need every man possible on the field
Aven8;4239193 said:Yes he should play.
His leadership and calling the defense has been missing. It's not just his play that has been missed.
IMO he's the leader of our defense.

jazzcat22;4239196 said:Yeah, he should play if the DR's clear him too. My only thought is, what if the cast keeps him from making a game changing INT, instead it is just a pass defensed.....but then again he was in position to break up that pass, as someone else, it could have been completed........oh, the complexity turns....
YES if he can...play!!!!
lane;4239097 said:man...we need him in the worst way..
but..will he be effective with the injury?
thoughts?
i think he will be fine in pass coverage..but trying to tackle makes me uneasy.
