SI: 10 guys that need to go... now (Flozell Adams #9)

EndGame

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,357
Reaction score
367
From the text of the list:

It's time for the Cowboys to make an upgrade.

Two things:

1) Flozell hasn't played THAT poorly of late. He hasn't been up to his usual standards, but coming off his injury that's to be expected.

2) It's time for an upgrade? Okay. Who is available?
 

JD_KaPow

jimnabby
Messages
11,072
Reaction score
10,836
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
That was really strange. Basically, it says "Flozell hasn't been bad, but he might be bad over the remainder of the season." They couldn't come up with somebody better (um, worse) than that for number 9? Really?

I also liked their Haynesworth blurb. "We're all for giving a guy a second chance, but..." not really, since we're putting him on this list. (Note: I'm not defending Haynesworth, I'm just annoyed by SI trying to have it both ways).

Really poor article. I'm surprised a magazine with the standards of SI - oh, wait a minute. Never mind.
 

cowboyed

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,714
Reaction score
1,729
Zman5;1166467 said:
Flo should be moved to RT next year.


Makes sense, has he played in that position earlier in his career or college?
 

Screw The Hall

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,083
Reaction score
2,115
YoMick;1166565 said:
Magically delicious? Yuk!

You didn't love "the charms"? Sacrilege I tell ya.

It's the one cereal I didn't need milk for as a kid. Well, unless you count Booberry and Capt'n Crunch ... oh nevermind ... I'm getting hungry.
 

Yeagermeister

Well-Known Member
Messages
47,629
Reaction score
117
cowboyed;1166562 said:
Makes sense, has he played in that position earlier in his career or college?

He played RG for us his rookie year but I don't know about RT in college.
 

BigD_95

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,014
Reaction score
2,020
that was the dumbest thing I ever read.

***but they face some tough pass-rushing teams in the coming weeks and Adams may not hold up in the critical left tackle position***



Well shouldnt we wait to see if he does hold up first before we say he **Worn Out Their Welcome***
 

baj1dallas

New Member
Messages
6,556
Reaction score
1
SI sucks, they got no ability to analyze the game so they take huge pictures and write two sentences that sound great to people that are casual fans.
 

AdamJT13

Salary Cap Analyst
Messages
16,583
Reaction score
4,529
STATS Inc. says Flozell Adams has allowed 5.5 sacks and one holding penalty for a total of 6.5 negative plays in nine games.

Compare that to these other left tackles --

Robert Gallery 10.5 negative plays
Leonard Davis 9.0
D'Brickashaw Ferguson 6.0
Walter Jones 5.5
Bryant McKinnie 5.0
Orlando Pace 4.5 (in eight games)

Does this mean Walter Jones is one sack or holding penalty away from "needing to go"?
 

BulletBob

The Godfather
Messages
2,597
Reaction score
1,279
Yeagermeister;1166505 said:
Freeney vs Flo is the matchup that worries me the most.

I'm not as worried about that matchup, Yeager, since Mr. Moxie is behind center.

The matchup that worries me the most is on the other side of the equation.

Ellis-Replacement vs. Addai or Clark.

When you think of that matchup, it makes you feel a bit better that we still have Al S on the roster.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294

joseephuss

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,041
Reaction score
6,920
AdamJT13;1166601 said:
STATS Inc. says Flozell Adams has allowed 5.5 sacks and one holding penalty for a total of 6.5 negative plays in nine games.

Compare that to these other left tackles --

Robert Gallery 10.5 negative plays
Leonard Davis 9.0
D'Brickashaw Ferguson 6.0
Walter Jones 5.5
Bryant McKinnie 5.0
Orlando Pace 4.5 (in eight games)

Does this mean Walter Jones is one sack or holding penalty away from "needing to go"?

Didn't Gallery miss a game or two this year? If you look on ESPN, it says "did not play" beside every game of Gallery. Sounds about right if anyone has watched him play. He is horrible and I am surprised that he only has 10.5 negative plays listed.

Flozell does not deserve to be on that list. Most guys coming back from his injury would not be 100%.
 

TEK2000

New Member
Messages
2,152
Reaction score
0
The Oakland Raiders offensive line has allowed 47 sacks thru 9 games..... and they don't have A SINGLE offensive lineman on the list... yet they throw Flozell Adams on there.

This must have been written by the idiot Pete Prisco. Oh my bad... he writes for CBS Sportsline... might as well be the same thing. Its all TRASH anyway.

I'm surprised he didn't put Roy Williams as the #1 player who has worn out his welcome.

Freaking idiots.
 

Alexander

What's it going to be then, eh?
Messages
62,482
Reaction score
67,294
TEK2000;1167049 said:
The Oakland Raiders offensive line has allowed 47 sacks thru 9 games..... and they don't have A SINGLE offensive lineman on the list... yet they throw Flozell Adams on there.

How about Robert Gallery?

Can he be more of a disappointment and "need to go"?
 

Gryphon

Merge Ahead
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
31
Flozell Adams | OT, Cowboys
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/mul...content.9.html

The Cowboys have surrendered fewer sacks since Tony Romo took over for Drew Bledsoe, but they face some tough pass-rushing teams in the coming weeks and Adams may not hold up in the critical left tackle position. He had season-ending knee injury last year. It's time for the Cowboys to make an upgrade.
__________________
for more updates visit http://gryphononcowboys.blogspot.com/
 
Top