Silver N Blue
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 8,414
- Reaction score
- 9,255
I don't like the idea of drafting a DE to sit on the bench or reduce our pass rush by taking out Mincey (sorry, but no matter how good the pass rusher is, Mincey>a rookie DE). At our spot there will be several good linebacking, CB (seeing as we might have to release Carr), and RB options... I would much rather go that route.
You have Hardy for one year. Now, the hope is that he will be here for longer then that but it's not for sure. It makes a lot of sense to draft a guy who can pass rush IMO. Those guys will always hold value so I don't see it as a wasted pick if you draft a guy who can pass rush. JMO
You have Hardy for one year. Now, the hope is that he will be here for longer then that but it's not for sure. It makes a lot of sense to draft a guy who can pass rush IMO. Those guys will always hold value so I don't see it as a wasted pick if you draft a guy who can pass rush. JMO
I want to draft guys that can help us win a Super Bowl this year, so we need players that will help fill holes this year. DE is not a hole, I would say if Hardy is his usual self it is an area of strength.
You don't draft to fill holes. You draft the best talent in areas of need. If a Pass Rusher is the best player on the board, you take him. That's how you win championships.
Agreed but this article is acting like we should draft a DE even if they are the 10th DE taken and Gurley/Gordon are sitting right there (which is probably possible). All things equal you take someone at a position of need, not someone who will be our 4th DE, especially in the first.
