SI King: Assistant coaches worried about their jobs in 2011

WoodysGirl

U.N.I.T.Y
Staff member
Messages
79,281
Reaction score
45,652
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Posted: Tuesday March 23, 2010 11:48AM; Updated: Tuesday March 23, 2010 11:49AM

There's a subclass of NFL workers more worried than the players about a potential 2011 work stoppage: the assistant coaches. That worry comes in various forms, like Vikings assistant Derek Mason leaving a playoff team for a similar job at Stanford, and Cowboys assistant Todd Grantham doing the same to go to Georgia, and other coaches -- many of them, I'm told -- are considering similar moves that would have been considered a step down in peaceful labor years.

"Assistant coaches are really angry right now,'' said Larry Kennan, the executive director of the NFL Coaches Association. "They're more frustrated with management and ownership than at any time I can remember. They want to be treated with the same respect that they've given to the game over the years, but they're not.''

Kennan and the assistants are angry because of the wildcat way teams are treating coaches in regard to contracts for the 2011 season, with the prospect of a job action looming as early as March of next year. Kennan would not supply specifics, because teams have warned coaches not to disclose contractual language, but teams have been planning how to treat coaches if a lockout occurs. Kennan broke down what teams are planning, in generalities:

• About a quarter of the 32 teams have not told coaches what their plans are, and whether they will employ coaches at their full or partial salaries -- or, in the case of one team, whether they will renew any of their contracts for the 2011 season.

• About a quarter of the teams have told coaches they will be paid normal salaries for between two months and six months -- and then, if there is a lockout, coaches will be paid a percentage of their contracts (which varies from team to team) while there is a lockout. If no games are lost due to the lockout, the lost money will be paid to coaches.

• About 10 teams will cut salaries immediately upon locking out the players. The pay cuts will be between 25 and 40 percent, and could increase if the job action persists.

• Several teams have told coaches they'll be paid in full, though some of that is still being determined by the remaining teams.

"It's really wrong that they tell us over and over again that we're family, then the first time there's a glitch in the system, they cut our pay,'' Kennan said.

The coaches are in a tough spot. They can't unionize, and they can't come forward complaining about their situations, for fear of retribution. But if there's no football, it stands to reason their contracts would be affected in some way -- because if the players aren't getting paid, most teams will feel, "Why should we pay the coaches who aren't coaching anyone?''

That doesn't stop the stress they feel. Most coaches don't have the bank balances of the players they coach. "And we don't have anywhere to go,'' said Jimmy Raye, the San Francisco offensive coordinator and the president of the Coaches Association's executive committee. "We have no voice to management or ownership, so a lot of these guys end up calling the guys who've been in the game for a while asking for advice.''

One of those guys is Raye, a 30-year NFL coaching veteran. "One assistant called me and told me he was in the last year of his contract, wasn't sure he was going to be given another one, and wasn't sure if it would have much value because of the lockout,'' said Raye. "He's got a wife, three children and wondered if he should take a job he got offered at Northern Arizona or stay. I said, 'Come on, I can't advise you on that.' But here's a guy who wants to stay in the NFL, who's a good coach, and doesn't know what to do.''

Said Raye: "All I would ask is there be some concern for the coaches, a voice of concern for us, to calm the anxiety they feel. If the coaches are coaching with anxiety, I think it could take away from the quality of the game and affect their preparation time.''

Point noted. The assistants won't have their voices heard at these league meetings, but what would be good to see is a veteran coach with maximum job security pressing the league to get some equality in the contracts for the assistants -- so that the coaches for Team X are treated contractually the same as the coaches for Team Y in the event of a lockout.



Read More: http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/peter_king/03/23/mail/index.html#ixzz0j8AkDPLI
Get a free NFL Team Jacket and Tee with SI Subscription
 

arglebargle

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,373
Reaction score
409
Here is a situation where Jerry's strong sense of loyalty will probably help the Cowboys. I'd imagine that we're on the good side of this with our coaching staff.
 

Hoofbite

Well-Known Member
Messages
40,870
Reaction score
11,569
arglebargle;3319099 said:
Here is a situation where Jerry's strong sense of loyalty will probably help the Cowboys. I'd imagine that we're on the good side of this with our coaching staff.

I'd like to think so. Bash the man all you want for football stuff but I've never heard anything bad about the Jones family as far as character goes. You gotta believe the coaches in Dallas are sitting pretty nice compared to some around the league.
 

CowboyMike

Stay Thirsty, My Friends
Messages
5,448
Reaction score
669
Didn't Grantham leave because he was going to be the D-coordinator over there? I didn't think it had anything to do with the lock out.
 

gmoney112

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,589
Reaction score
15,694
CowboyMike;3319240 said:
Didn't Grantham leave because he was going to be the D-coordinator over there? I didn't think it had anything to do with the lock out.

They like to link irrelevant events with a similar result to try and prove their talking points.
 
Top