SI: Peter King's MMQB Power Ranking

[VACowboy]

He says of the Cowboys:

10. Dallas. No other team has a better twin pass-rush threat than Demarcus Ware and Anthony Spencer, and few teams have the multiplicity of weapons on offense. If Dez Bryant catches on quickly -- that's a big if -- the Cowboys could be the first home team to win a Super Bowl ever. But something always happens in the NFC East, something weird. The Eagles could rebound with the energy of a new quarterback to make the playoffs, but I feel pretty good about a second team making the playoffs out of the division. For five straight years, the East has produced at least one Wild Card.

He has the Gnats at #9 and Philthy, Minnesota and New England out of the top 10.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/peter_king/05/16/ranking/1.html

 

[21Savage]

I'm sorry, but even coming off that 08 season, I didn't see 9 teams in football that were better than us. I sure don't see 9 now. But offseason rankings don't mean ****

 

[TheCount]

I'm sorry, but even coming off that 08 season, I didn't see 9 teams in football that were better than us. I sure don't see 9 now. But offseason rankings don't mean ****

Rankings never mean **** unless it's after the season.

 

[CATCH17]

We don't have a lot of gimme games (extremely tough schedule) so as good as we are we may still be a wildcard team.

 

[SDCowboy]

Ranking us 10 is just crap. They honestly think the Giants are going to be better than us? It's of course possible but to predict it is insane.

 

[superpunk]

Giants at 9? What on earth could be giving him a hard-on for mediocre-Blue?

 

[TheCount]

Giants at 9? What on earth could be giving him a hard-on for mediocre-Blue?

They have Peyton's little brother, duh!

 

[SDCowboy]

I'm sorry, but even coming off that 08 season, I didn't see 9 teams in football that were better than us. I sure don't see 9 now. But offseason rankings don't mean ****

Even BSPN has us at 5 or 6.

 

[JBS]

We don't have a lot of gimme games (extremely tough schedule) so as good as we are we may still be a wildcard team.

wildcard team? You think there is a team in our division that can win the east outside of us? I don't

 

[PhillyCowboysFan]

Giants at 9? What on earth could be giving him a hard-on for mediocre-Blue?

And Miami at 6. What the ****. He really has a hard on for Bill!

 

[JBS]

And Miami at 6. What the ****. He really has a hard on for Bill!

Carolina at 8? LoL, Ware and Spencer would give that kid Moore nightmares

 

[SDCowboy]

And Miami at 6. What the ****. He really has a hard on for Bill!

Sounds like this list was just to bring rating to an irrelevant magazine company that nobody reads anymore. :laugh2:

 

[Chief]

And Miami at 6. What the ****. He really has a hard on for Bill!

Giants at 9? What on earth could be giving him a hard-on for mediocre-Blue?

What is this?

Erection Day?

 

[InmanRoshi]

Whatever he sees in Carolina, I'm not seeing it. I think they could be absolutely awful next year.

 

[HoleInTheRoof]

It should be noted he wrote his article BEFORE we cut Proctor.

We'll be around 14-17 now, I imagine.

 

[superpunk]

Every day is erection day.

 

[Section446]

I'll never understand why people get so worked up about power rankings, especially this early in the off-season.

 

[VACowboy]

I'll never understand why people get so worked up about power rankings, especially this early in the off-season.

I actually love it when everyone undervalues the Cowboys.

 

[SDCowboy]

I'll never understand why people get so worked up about power rankings, especially this early in the off-season.

Because a lot of the rankings in this list are just absurd in this point in time.

 

[HoleInTheRoof]

I'll never understand why people get so worked up about power rankings, especially this early in the off-season.

It's because it's the off season.

If we can dedicate 40 pages to Patrick Crayton, or 20 pages to who the value-winner was in the Barbie for Barron trade . . . then I think we can talk about power rankings a little.