Why to move on: Tate flashed ability during rookie camps with the team, but he has made more waves hawking donuts and stirring up NASCAR fans than catching passes. The Seahawks have had little trouble cutting their losses when appropriate. They weren't going to prop up Charlie Whitehurst just because they traded for him. Why ignore the obvious here? Tate hasn't produced, and Baldwin has looked like the superior option from the slot, where Tate was supposed to flourish. Rice, Williams, Obomanu, Durham and Baldwin give the team five promising options. Even without Tate, the Seahawks would lead the NFC West in 2010 draft choices projected to start this season (Russell Okung, Earl Thomas, Kam Chancellor and Walter Thurmond). Swallowing a little pride wouldn't hurt too bad.
What I would do: Keep Tate and put him on notice. It's early to give up on a second-round pick who has flashed potential (52-yard catch at Denver last season). Tate has barely had one month in a new offense. Situations at quarterback and along the offensive line haven't been ideal, either. A year ago, the Arizona Cardinals weren't sure what to make of third-round rookie receiver Andre Roberts. Now, Roberts starts opposite Larry Fitzgerald.