Shinywalrus
Active Member
- Messages
- 1,748
- Reaction score
- 10
Not sure if this has been posted yet - apologies if so.
http://footballoutsiders.com/extra-points/2012/look-kids-snap-data
A few highlights:
- Ogletree's performance was really quite insane in context of the amount of time he actually spent on the field. He played fewer than 49% of our snaps and caught balls on roughly a quarter of those snaps. That's an insanely high rate (considering many of those were running plays)
- Ware got more rest than usual. He is usually 100% or nearly 100% of defensive snaps. Only 91% this time.
- Connor, Silva and Albright are our ST specialists. Each of them played on essentially every team
- Silva had a surprising number of defensive snaps at 39%, more than Connor, Spears or either of the Butlers
- Speaking of V. Butler, I was surprised to see his snap count at 6 on the defensive side of the ball. Are we missing something here?
- Crawford got on the field for 3 defensive snaps. I was hoping for a bit more, but in a close game, I suppose you go with what you know.
http://footballoutsiders.com/extra-points/2012/look-kids-snap-data
A few highlights:
- Ogletree's performance was really quite insane in context of the amount of time he actually spent on the field. He played fewer than 49% of our snaps and caught balls on roughly a quarter of those snaps. That's an insanely high rate (considering many of those were running plays)
- Ware got more rest than usual. He is usually 100% or nearly 100% of defensive snaps. Only 91% this time.
- Connor, Silva and Albright are our ST specialists. Each of them played on essentially every team
- Silva had a surprising number of defensive snaps at 39%, more than Connor, Spears or either of the Butlers
- Speaking of V. Butler, I was surprised to see his snap count at 6 on the defensive side of the ball. Are we missing something here?
- Crawford got on the field for 3 defensive snaps. I was hoping for a bit more, but in a close game, I suppose you go with what you know.

