SNF: Bears at Packers Thread

screw watching a slugfest with Chris Collinsworth doing the commentary

talk about bore on top of boring
 
Bob Sacamano;2939588 said:
screw watching a slugfest with Chris Collinsworth doing the commentary

talk about bore on top of boring

Oh cmon. The Cutler throwing into quad coverage and saying Favre woulda been proud was funny.
 
There's another rule change I would implement.

Does an illegal contact penalty really need to be an "automatic" first down?

Seriously, if you have a third and 20, should a five yard illegal contact penalty result in a first down?

Especially if the call is as bad as that one.

I really don't understand the logic in penalties.
 
I see All and Cris are falling over themselves to point out how that wasn't a penalty in order to pimp up the Packers.
 
Bizwah;2939591 said:
There's another rule change I would implement.

Does an illegal contact penalty really need to be an "automatic" first down?

Seriously, if you have a third and 20, should a five yard illegal contact penalty result in a first down?

Especially if the call is as bad as that one.

I really don't understand the logic in penalties.
then tell every defender to just hold everybody if you know it wont result in a first down. i see what you mean but i think the auto first down is ok because it keeps the defenses from using penalties on purpose.
 
cowboys#1;2939605 said:
then tell every defender to just hold everybody if you know it wont result in a first down. i see what you mean but i think the auto first down is ok because it keeps the defenses from using penalties on purpose.

Yeah....good point.
 
why is urlacher out? its a wrist. tape it up get a shot and get your butt back out there. dick butkis would play with a broken arm hanging off his shoulder.
 
Wow, nice pass/catch for a TD.....GB up 6. Not sure the point of the 2pt though.
 
Going for two is kind of pointless here.

It doesn't make it 7 points so whats the use?

Hope the Bears muff the PAT if they score?
 
Hoofbite;2939646 said:
Going for two is kind of pointless here.

It doesn't make it 7 points so whats the use?

Hope the Bears muff the PAT if they score?
Yeah, I don't get that at all. INT the other way is 2 points for the Bears and a FG wins it.
 
Hoofbite;2939646 said:
Going for two is kind of pointless here.

It doesn't make it 7 points so whats the use?

Hope the Bears muff the PAT if they score?

that has to be the only reason Mr. No Ears went for two.
 
Hostile;2939654 said:
Yeah, I don't get that at all. INT the other way is 2 points for the Bears and a FG wins it.

this isnt college, unless i have been completely oblivious to a fairly major rule change.
 
Hostile;2939654 said:
Yeah, I don't get that at all. INT the other way is 2 points for the Bears and a FG wins it.

In college. Play over if int in pros.
 
Wow...Cutler sucks.

Edit: N/M...that was on the reciever.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,576
Messages
13,819,724
Members
23,780
Latest member
HoppleSopple
Back
Top