So according to Theisman all good Romo has done is now erased

X-Dawg you're just butt hurt because Bledsoe proved he's the starter and you don't like it.
 
X-Dawg said:
156.2 Romo 144.8 Bledsoe - Romo had the higher QB rating in the rain with scabs from small colleges....
Romo will be our man.

while playing scabs from small colleges
 
X-Dawg said:
156.2 Romo 144.8 Bledsoe - Romo had the higher QB rating in the rain with scabs from small colleges....
Romo will be our man.


Now THAT is an interesting stat.

I'm not sure how many scabs Bledsoe has from small colleges (in the rain), or Romo for that matter. However, I am very interested in your sources, can you provide a link?








I bet Henson eats his scabs from small colleges (in the rain of course) out of romo-sexual jealousy.
 
tothewhipbill said:
that was the most love i've seen theismann throw the cowboys in ... well... forever.

the guy was practically gushing over bledsoe.

it was surreal.

I noticed that as well. Normally I can't stand the guy because he is such a homer but he actually had a lot of praise for the boys. I liked the fact that Tony K. caught on to that fact and kept it going for quite a while.
 
X-Dawg said:
I was more impressed w/TR in the rain than Bledsoe who missed some open guys with the first team and it took two defensive penalties to help him out.

Yes. 13 points against the scrubs vs. 17 points against the 1st stringers is very impressive :eek: Bledsoe had a much better game, open your eyes.
 
Don't forget, we had McQuistan (Adams hurt) in at LT, Hurd in at WR and Fabini at RT when the starters for both teams were in.
 
X-Dawg said:
156.2 Romo 144.8 Bledsoe - Romo had the higher QB rating in the rain with scabs from small colleges....
Romo will be our man.

Parcells only let Romo throw 8 short passes against the 2nd stringers vs. Bledsoe throwing 16 passes against the starting defense. Bledsoe played much better overall.
 
What is the big deal..?

Can we all be happy that finally we have a clear #2 QB since the days of Jason Garrett..?

That's been a long time, folks.

Sure beats having 2 #1's or no clear #1's like we've had over the last 5 years.

Give it a rest. We all like Romo. Once he passes for 10,000 yards like Bledsoe, I'll be happy to hop on the bandwagon.

Please remember, defensive coordinators are NOT GAMEPLANNING right now to stop ROMO yet..?

These game are nothing more than organized scrimmages and interviews for backup positions. Our starters are basically set.

Romo is not the starter and doesn't have a real shot at it barring an injury.

Period.

But it's fun to see him recite his lessons as a student on the field of play. It's taken 4 years.

Hmm..think about that just by itself. 4 years..?


Like Parcells told Romo last week, it's a little early for that bust in Canton for Romo or the Ring or Honor or the #1 QB role.

Give this a rest.

parcellswaterboy
 
I for one take solace in the fact that should Bledsoe go down, at least we have a semi-capable backup that could win some games. :)

On top of that we now have someone that might one day become our starting quarterback. This would not only alleviate the need to spend a first round pick but would in turn enable us to use that pick on another impact position as well as eliminating the need for a multiple year learning curve. :D

A good position to be in I must say. :starspin
 
X-Dawg said:
156.2 Romo 144.8 Bledsoe - Romo had the higher QB rating in the rain with scabs from small colleges....
Romo will be our man.

I guess if we're being selective we can just forget that Romo had the fumble that cost the defense the shutout. Romo sucks. Get over it.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,098
Messages
13,849,997
Members
23,786
Latest member
waycooljr
Back
Top