Yakuza Rich
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,043
- Reaction score
- 12,385
I posted this up in my blog (link below), but here's what I found from my charting the first half of the New Orleans game.
1. New Orleans had 8+ defenders in the box 16 out of 39 plays (41% of the times)
2. We still ran the ball 11 times out of those 16 times they had 8+ in the box (69% of the time)
3. We ran the ball 59% of the time up the middle.
We basically ran 11 different types of formations. However, we ran either a standard split back or I-formation 42% of the time.
Basically we were 4 times likely to run either a standard I formation or Split Back formation than any other formation (shotgun, 3 WR, etc) out there.
The running game wasn't without its flaws against New Orleans, but it did a lot better than people give it credit for, especially since it was designed to make it very difficult to run the ball in the first place.
If you want to know why Parcells hasn't tore into the running game against New Orleans, this is probably the reason why.
YAKUZA
1. New Orleans had 8+ defenders in the box 16 out of 39 plays (41% of the times)
2. We still ran the ball 11 times out of those 16 times they had 8+ in the box (69% of the time)
3. We ran the ball 59% of the time up the middle.
We basically ran 11 different types of formations. However, we ran either a standard split back or I-formation 42% of the time.
Basically we were 4 times likely to run either a standard I formation or Split Back formation than any other formation (shotgun, 3 WR, etc) out there.
The running game wasn't without its flaws against New Orleans, but it did a lot better than people give it credit for, especially since it was designed to make it very difficult to run the ball in the first place.
If you want to know why Parcells hasn't tore into the running game against New Orleans, this is probably the reason why.
YAKUZA