Some moves the Boys WON'T MAKE

burmafrd

Well-Known Member
Messages
43,820
Reaction score
3,379
NO TO
No FA QB's
No drafted QB's or RB's
Will not go after Abraham
Will not go after Law
Will not go after Woodson
 

felix360

Active Member
Messages
1,143
Reaction score
21
:mad: :mad: NO FA QB' s = dumb move :mad:
come on, brees' will most likely be a FA, why wouldnt JJ think about bringing him in, talk about winning now, we can win now and years to come with a QB that is young and exp. like him, bledsoe is old maybe hear for another year, then after that we got squat. i say bring him in, let bledsoe and him battle it out, bledsoe complains he wasnt given a chance in Buffalo to compete, well let him compete for the job here, we'' ll see what happens.
Bledsoe had an alright year, mostly becuz he was driven to prove the bills wrong, he did that last season , i dont he'll have that same motivation this year.

I sure hope im wrong.:confused:
 

david_jackson

New Member
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
There is a major downside in change quarterbacks and having to establish chemistry AGAIN with Center, RB, WR...... to overcome that downside to trade QB there needs to be a Major upgrade. I see Brees as an upgrade just not enought to overcome the downside:)
 

baj1dallas

New Member
Messages
6,556
Reaction score
1
I agree with all of them...if we could bring in Law as a FS, for a lot less than a $10 mil bonus and have the next Aeneas Williams it would be great...but Law's gonna likely sign a high dollar shorter term contract imo.
 

Echo9

Erik_H
Messages
3,773
Reaction score
1,814
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
david_jackson said:
There is a major downside in change quarterbacks and having to establish chemistry AGAIN with Center, RB, WR...... to overcome that downside to trade QB there needs to be a Major upgrade. I see Brees as an upgrade just not enought to overcome the downside:)

Throw a shoulder injury into the mix.

I agree.
 
Top