Sydla
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 64,720
- Reaction score
- 100,945
The "spread" is about $4MM that would have been moved to next year's cap to just get rid of his bad contract (and his poor play). Frankly, we could have made him a regular cut and while eating over $9MM in dead money this year would have saved just under $9MM on this year's cap. But instead, we decided to lock ourselves in for 2-3 more years with a guy who is so blah right now the coaches are publicly calling him out.That isn't a savings -- it is spreading the hit over two years.
But thanks for your effort. It must be hard when you don't really understand the salary cap to comment -- good for you for trying!
So to reiterate. Option A would have cut him regular and saved $8.75MM this year and eaten $9MM+ in dead money. Or we could have gone with Option B which was June 1 cut him, saved $14MM this year, eaten $5MM in dead money in 2026 and then $4MM in 2027.
We went with option C, which saved us $13MM this year but then locked us in for a minimum of 2 years, when we could save $0 in 2027 if we make him a June 1 cut.
Option A or B were better choices.
