Sounds like Steele is on the hot seat

That isn't a savings -- it is spreading the hit over two years.

But thanks for your effort. It must be hard when you don't really understand the salary cap to comment -- good for you for trying!
The "spread" is about $4MM that would have been moved to next year's cap to just get rid of his bad contract (and his poor play). Frankly, we could have made him a regular cut and while eating over $9MM in dead money this year would have saved just under $9MM on this year's cap. But instead, we decided to lock ourselves in for 2-3 more years with a guy who is so blah right now the coaches are publicly calling him out.

So to reiterate. Option A would have cut him regular and saved $8.75MM this year and eaten $9MM+ in dead money. Or we could have gone with Option B which was June 1 cut him, saved $14MM this year, eaten $5MM in dead money in 2026 and then $4MM in 2027.

We went with option C, which saved us $13MM this year but then locked us in for a minimum of 2 years, when we could save $0 in 2027 if we make him a June 1 cut.

Option A or B were better choices.
 
Agreed.

Which is why they chose the option of restructuring his deal rather than flat out cut him.

A poor choice IMO. Shotty is basically calling him out, which is clearly not a good sign.
I agree.

But I think Shotty is just trying to motivate him. He did it with Guyton earlier saying it was a competition but I don’t think there ever was.

Now why do you have to motivate a 7 year pro I don’t know….seems nuts.


And in Steeles defense I think at one point there was a decent player until the injury. I wonder at what point so they come to the conclusion this may be him.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,853
Messages
14,564,221
Members
24,213
Latest member
Debi
Back
Top