Spagnola: the truth behind Emmitt-less losses *MERGE*

I dont NEED to read EVERY response I respond to the OP, also skim down and respond to a response I dont agree with WITH MY OWN NATURAL THOUGHT, IDC if someone also felt the same way and responded, this is an open forum and you need to stop trying to be Site **** and MYODB..seriously *** do you have the right to tell me when and how im supposed to respond.. we fly back in time to Censorship in the media?
the fact that you still are focused on it its laughable, not the last word your remarks are hollow and unnecessary to begin with, saying discussed and late to the party was the issue..you dont get to do that , crawl back in your cubicle and stay out of my business..

theres are 100s of post and new threads that discus the same and I mean redundant discussions that arent being erased by MOds..obviously we all dont read every line of every post and have the right to start new threads or new responses.

back to your hold ****

I was inviting you to step up your game, indulge and elevate your insults. Alas, all you can muster is a rambling bunch of nothing, defensive posturing (stay out of your business, even though you responded to my post first :laugh:) and a reference to *****, which any unoriginal middle school goober can and does use as the ultimate slight.

Don't say I didn't try to encourage you to embrace your cerebral, intellectual side. Then again, the absence thereof may be classic foreshadowing on your part. ;)

Crawling back to my ivory tower cubicle as I breathlessly await your next creation of inanity. :laugh:
 
I was inviting you to step up your game, indulge and elevate your insults. Alas, all you can muster is a rambling bunch of nothing, defensive posturing (stay out of your business, even though you responded to my post first :laugh:) and a reference to *****, which any unoriginal middle school goober can and does use as the ultimate slight.

Don't say I didn't try to encourage you to embrace your cerebral, intellectual side. Then again, the absence thereof may be classic foreshadowing on your part. ;)

Crawling back to my ivory tower cubicle as I breathlessly await your next creation of inanity. :laugh:
waste of time...… you didnt read forst response, no time for reading ALL of everything, read what I want and respond when I want.. move on..up my responses and insults gets me a 3day ban brah.. move on..troll someone else..
 
waste of time...… you didnt read forst response, no time for reading ALL of everything, read what I want and respond when I want.. move on..up my responses and insults gets me a 3day ban brah.. move on..troll someone else..
Again, I remind you, YOU responded to my post FIRST, and tried to be insulting at that.
And you call me the troll? :lmao:
Don't bite off more than you can chew next time, son.
Or at the very least, read the full content and context - especially when you're trying to school someone - before you mouth off and find yourself in a situation from which you can't extricate yourself. :thumbup:
 
Again, I remind you, YOU responded to my post FIRST, and tried to be insulting at that.
And you call me the troll? :lmao:
Don't bite off more than you can chew next time, son.
Or at the very least, read the full content and context - especially when you're trying to school someone - before you mouth off and find yourself in a situation from which you can't extricate yourself. :thumbup:
man you are living way to much in the virtual world, made no sense, this isnt game show, we arent winning or losing anything..

you butted into my post where it didnt belong..i did not need to know someone commented similarly before I got to the party..doesnt matter shared my thoughts and thats how it works..move on Troll and dont call me son, im almost 50 and only my dad calls me that..move on troll

move on down the road...
 
In fairness to Mickey, is he ever allowed to disagree with the front office and keep his job?
 
man you are living way to much in the virtual world, made no sense, this isnt game show, we arent winning or losing anything..

you butted into my post where it didnt belong..i did not need to know someone commented similarly before I got to the party..doesnt matter shared my thoughts and thats how it works..move on Troll and dont call me son, im almost 50 and only my dad calls me that..move on troll

move on down the road...

I thought you said this was a waste of your time? And yet you post again.
And you must have chronological deficiencies. You responded to my post first.
Now you're ego won't let it go even though you say it's a waste of your time. :rolleyes:
Again, don't start nutin, won't be nutin, son. ;)
 
Pathetic coaching in those 2 games. One player is missing and they fall apart? Jimmy did a poor job of preparing his team for those games, and his lack of preperation caused those 8 turnovers. Just terrible coaching.
 
I thought you said this was a waste of your time? And yet you post again.
And you must have chronological deficiencies. You responded to my post first.
Now you're ego won't let it go even though you say it's a waste of your time. :rolleyes:
Again, don't start nutin, won't be nutin, son. ;)
meh keep thinking that ..delusional keyboard stroker,,troll..:oldcouple::rolleyes::espn: <you
 
I read that. It's odd. My feeling was Lassic sucked. Could be losing tainted my view of his performance.
No no, It can't be. All I have ever heard was "ANYONE" could run behind the MASSIVE O-line Emmitt had. LOL....

Hmmm, Guess not, Maybe Emmitt had just a "little" talent to go along with that MASSIVE, ANYONE CAN RUN BEHIND O-LINE. lol
 
says the tool who wants the last word..troll:facepalm::muttley:
Ah, but I never said this was a waste of my time. I'm actually enjoying this. I've been out of practice.
YOU, on the other hand, said this was a waste of your time. But it's really not. Your ego is wounded, and you want to have the last word.
But it's on me (or the moderators who tire of this back and forth and shut the thread down) whether I relent. I pretty much enjoy irritating you, especially because of your condescending approach and manner. Others who questioned my post did so respectfully and got an acknowledgement from me as well, thanking them for spotting my erroneous timeline.
YOU, on the other hand, felt the need to be insulting. So I thought, "Hey, if he is so quick to condescend and offer third-grade imbecilic retorts, I'll see if he can take it."
Nah, you can't. That's why you persist.
But as Cap says …
th
 
"Pretty lame to blame a 35-16 season-opening loss to the Commanders at RFK and a 13-10 home loss to a Buffalo team they had smoked 52-17 to win Super Bowl XXVII that same year on Jan. 31 on not having Emmitt. Shame on any of us who might have fell for that b.s."

-Mickey Spagnaola


Gotta love revisionist history...:laugh:

Won't be long before Bryant's catch in Green Bay is actually a catch .....:popcorn:

You seem to forget the EIGHT turnovers in those two games including SIX picks by Aikman, 1 of which was late in the bills game in the end zone that would have put the Cowboys ahead. Lets not for get that stingy defense the p[revious season gave up THIRTY FIVE points to start the season. Spagnoala had it right that Not having Emmitt wasn't the cause for those 2 losses.
.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,631
Messages
14,548,800
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top