Speculation: Mark Barron might know we're picking him

lqmac1

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,558
Reaction score
3,615
I'm an avid twitter user, earlier yesterday Bryan Broaddus, I believe it was him, retweeted Mark Barron saying something along the lines of " Just finished meetings in the lonestar state, #cowboyszone". Today I logged on to get a pic of it to share on here and the tweet was deleted, kinda interesting....
 
You do understand that in order for us to pick up, the other 13 teams in front of us can't. So....its all moot?
 
stop_sign_1.jpg
 
According to Josh Ellis, Barron tweeted this and then deleted it.
 
Pouncy said the same thing last year.

I think we like Barron, but no way unless we have the #3 pick can we guarantee him that he will be a Cowboy.
 
I do not want to trade up!! I repeat do not want to. I really want Barron here, I think he solves a bunch of holes in the secondary. He'd be one of the captains on the field besides Ware and Lee. As much as I want him here we can not afford to lose multiple picks trading up. Just to many holes to fill right now.
 
DEZBRYANT x88x;4519417 said:
I do not want to trade up!! I repeat do not want to. I really want Barron here, I think he solves a bunch of holes in the secondary. He'd be one of the captains on the field besides Ware and Lee. As much as I want him here we can not afford to lose multiple picks trading up. Just to many holes to fill right now.

From an earlier tweet by Schefter it may not be that much to trade up a few spots if someone was there that we really liked. As for Barron, (While I disagree on the pick, I prefer DeCastro) he would certainly help in our secondary. I think however, we need to do everything we can to fix the Oline now to keep Romo clean so he can keep the defense off the field so they don't get tired and collapse in the fourth quarter.
 
I think the Cowboys have two picks they want Barron and Decastro, and without a doubt one of them will be gone by there pick. The question is who
 
Hostile;4519378 said:
Barron is who my money is on, but not who I hope we get.

I rarely agree with you but on this I do. I think we are going to go hard after Barron and I think he will be available when we pick. I would rather Decastro simply because I think he would be the BAP if he made it that far.. or a strong player on the defensive line.
 
Cajuncowboy;4519429 said:
From an earlier tweet by Schefter it may not be that much to trade up a few spots if someone was there that we really liked. As for Barron, (While I disagree on the pick, I prefer DeCastro) he would certainly help in our secondary. I think however, we need to do everything we can to fix the Oline now to keep Romo clean so he can keep the defense off the field so they don't get tired and collapse in the fourth quarter.
I understand wanting Decastro completely. I don't think he'll be there at 14. I think who would be there would be Brockers, Poe, and maybe even Couples. Then if that's the case I say trade back. But if Barron isn't there, and Decastro, Poe and Brockers are there give me Decastro in a Heartbeat.
 
DEZBRYANT x88x;4519437 said:
I understand wanting Decastro completely. I don't think he'll be there at 14. I think who would be there would be Brockers, Poe, and maybe even Couples. Then if that's the case I say trade back. But if Barron isn't there, and Decastro, Poe and Brockers are there give me Decastro in a Heartbeat.

I think we go Decastro or Barron unless someone surprising drops.
 
ufcrules1;4519434 said:
I rarely agree with you but on this I do. I think we are going to go hard after Barron and I think he will be available when we pick. I would rather Decastro simply because I think he would be the BAP if he made it that far.. or a strong player on the defensive line.
Work on that a little.

:grin:
 
I believe Dallas likes Cox, Barron, DeCastro at 14.

Only Jerry knows the order or what it'd take for him to move down.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,684
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top