Wrong.
The Franchise Tag is a good option for RBs and TEs because it is much smaller than for other positions.
Franchising Pollard and cutting Zeke will give them a season to develop a replacement (draft pick).
There is a reason that players/agents hate the Franchise Tag and Teams love it.
Except the Team is actually paying top5 salary/ cap hit to a player with no long term deal in place. Everyone harps over aav but it's rare for players cap hits to be near the aav on long term deals until the end which in most cases the team just cuts the player or extends them if they are still playing well, as most guarantees had run out. Outside of QBs due to their high ratio of guaranteed money to total money. But even then a guy like Dak cap hit has been under half of his aav so far. And it probably will be next year as well with another restructure. With the cap rising again like crazy its better to pay less up front and more potentially later.
Unless the team just wants an one and done with Pollard I don't see the point of eating that cap hit for a position like the rb spot. Just draft one if they don't want to keep him long term and save 9 mil. Running backs are a dime a dozen outside of a handful of players
A Franchise of Pollard + a pre June st cut of Zeke is 22 mil in cap space for 1 rb on the roster.
Like Schultz, Pollard isn't a top 5 player at his position. If they re-sign Schultz this off-season they screwed up again letting another player play on the tag.