tunahelper
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,820
- Reaction score
- 2,315
13 wins is a lot for a prediction, so you gotta say they have balls.
since they predicted we go 13-3, did they say who will give us the 3 losses?TheSkaven;1551343 said:Sorry if this is a repost.
Anyone else pick up a copy of The Sporting News magazine? I don't usually read it, but I'm taking a long flight on business and needed some reading material, picked it up today. I was going to wait until Monday to read it but I couldn't resist the "AFC/NFC Predictions" teaser on the cover.
Long story short, they picked our Cowboys to go 13-3 this season, win the NFC East and top seed in the NFC, and lose to the Patriots in the Superbowl. The Eagles were picked at 9-7, with the Giants and Commanders both under 7 wins.
Perhaps even more surprising than that - Of the 25 experts, 13 picked the Patriots to win the whole thing and 6 picked our Cowboys.
I haven't seen this much love for our boys in the media in a long time! Can't wait to read the whole magazine cover to cover.![]()
Beast_from_East;1551604 said:SuperCow, you and me dont agree on much, especially when it comes to Jerry Jones, but I have to agree with you on this one buddy.
10 wins in reg season and 1 playoff victory would be freaking sweet. Of course 13-3 and SB appearance would be freaking awesome, but I dont want to get my hopes up that high.
10 wins and a playoff victory and we will build a freaking statue of Wade for the new stadium!!![]()
SkinsandTerps;1551344 said:You should read some of the player rankings from sporting news. IIRC, Romo and Campbell are both at the bottom neck and neck, the Cowboys RBs are both in the bottom half, its interesting and absurd.
Ahh, whats this got to do with us going 13-3, winning the east, and playing in the SB against the Pats? NOTHING!!!
The magazine has a fantasy football section and a pro football preview. The pro football preview is the one that has the Cowboy as 13-3 with a Superbowl birth, the fantasy guys (clearly different writers) didn't rank the individual players as very high.big dog cowboy;1551393 said:That is all I needed to read to know this writer is lacking a few brain cells.
TheSkaven;1551792 said:The magazine has a fantasy football section and a pro football preview. The pro football preview is the one that has the Cowboy as 13-3 with a Superbowl birth, the fantasy guys (clearly different writers) didn't rank the individual players as very high.
The rankings that SkinsAndTerps pasted in is from their fantasy football draft board.
FYI also, JJT wrote a rather glowing article of the team. Didn't realize he was this high on the Cowboys. He's not exactly a homer or optimist.
lspain1;1552001 said:I want the Cowboys to win....but I don't think we have a prayer of going 13-3 in our division.
It's unlikely, but it's not as far fetched as some would think. I think 11-5 or 12-4 is where we'll end up. To some it might sound a bit homerish, but whatever.lspain1;1552001 said:I want the Cowboys to win....but I don't think we have a prayer of going 13-3 in our division.
THUMPER;1551389 said:Vince Young rated that far above Romo?
That's just a little Commanders' misinformation. TheSkaven cleared up that nonsense...nyc;1552017 said:Hey, Vince Young is the last of my worries. They have Chris Sims, Rex Grossman, Eli Manning, Byron Leftwich, Matt Schaub, Brodie Croyle, Matt Leinart, Michael Vick, and Daunte Culpepperabove Romo for no good reason. Ok, a few of them you *might* think they could be close at this stage, but Chris Sims? Matt Schaub? Matt Leinart? Culpepper? I mean ***?
TheSkaven;1551792 said:The magazine has a fantasy football section and a pro football preview. The pro football preview is the one that has the Cowboy as 13-3 with a Superbowl birth, the fantasy guys (clearly different writers) didn't rank the individual players as very high.
The rankings that SkinsAndTerps pasted in is from their fantasy football draft board.
FYI also, JJT wrote a rather glowing article of the team. Didn't realize he was this high on the Cowboys. He's not exactly a homer or optimist.
SkinsandTerps;1551356 said:Day 1: Quarterbacks
Peyton Manning 9.8
Tom Brady 9.7
Carson Palmer 9.5
Matt Hasselbeck 8.8
Drew Brees 8.7
Donovan McNabb 8.7
Marc Bulger 8.6
Ben Roethlisberger 8.5
Mike Vick 8.4
Jake Delhomme 8.4
Matt Leinart 8.1
Phillip Rivers 8.0
Daunte Culpepper 7.9
Vince Young 7.9
Jay Cutler 7.9
Rex Grossman 7.8
Chad Pennington 7.6
Brett Favre 7.5
Eli Manning 7.4
Byron Leftwich 7.2
Chris Simms 7.2
Steve McNair 7.0
Matt Schaub 7.0
Brodie Croyle 7.0
Alex Smith 6.8
Tony Romo 6.7
Jason Campbell 6.7
Jon Kitna 6.4
Tavaris Jackson 6.4
JP Losman 6.2
Brady Quinn NR
JaMarcus Russell NR
Running Backs
LaDainian Tomlinson 9.9
Larry Johnson 9.6
Edgerrin James 9.2
Shaun Alexander 9.2
Steven Jackson 9.0
Reggie Bush 8.9
Cadillac Williams 8.9
Ronnie Brown 8.5
Fred Taylor 8.3
Laurence Maroney 8.1
Willie Parker 8.0
Rudi Johnson 8.0
Brian Westbrook 7.9
Frank Gore 7.9
Clinton Portis 7.9
Joseph Addai 7.7
DeAngelo Williams 7.7
Warrick Dunn 7.6
Willis McGahee 7.6
Jamal Lewis 7.5
Cedric Benson 7.5
Chester Taylor 7.5
Travis Henry 7.5
LaMont Jordan 7.4
Thomas Jones 7.1
Ahman Green 7.1
Julius Jones 7.1
LenDale White 7.0
Reuben Droughns 7.0
Kevin Jones 6.8
Vernand Morency 5.5
Marshawn Lynch NR
I dont see how 2 of the 3 starters are so low and yet they expect you to go 13-3.
My point was that the Sporting News isnt in-line how they are ranking players.
THUMPER;1551474 said:I can't believe how many people here think we will only win 9 or 10 games this year. We won 9 games last year and threw away at least 3 games which would have put us at 12-4 and you don't think we are at least as good as last season? Wow, you must really want to avoid disappointment at all costs.
I think 12-4 is quite realistic for this year and expect to see us in the SB.
9 or 10 wins, sheesh! :bang2: