Sports Kings Mock Draft

Ingram will be a beast. If not him I see brokers as a real possibility. No way he falls to 32.
 
So the Rams drop from 2 to 6 for a 2nd round pick and then use that pick on a RT only?

I'm not buying it.
 
Risen Star;4388717 said:
So the Rams drop from 2 to 6 for a 2nd round pick and then use that pick on a RT only?

I'm not buying it.

They still get their guy, and add the 7th pick of the 2nd round. Gives them three of the top 50 players drafted. And the ability to bundle that 2nd rounder to move back into the first if they wish.

For a team rebuilding- I am buying it all day long.
 
Thanks for the feedback Cowboy fans! Will help with the next version of the mock!

Shane
 
JoeCorrado;4388862 said:
They still get their guy, and add the 7th pick of the 2nd round. Gives them three of the top 50 players drafted. And the ability to bundle that 2nd rounder to move back into the first if they wish.

For a team rebuilding- I am buying it all day long.

Then you're shortchanging yourself. If teams truly covet RGIII, you can get more for that pick than a 2nd round draft choice.
 
JoeCorrado;4388862 said:
They still get their guy, and add the 7th pick of the 2nd round. Gives them three of the top 50 players drafted. And the ability to bundle that 2nd rounder to move back into the first if they wish.

For a team rebuilding- I am buying it all day long.

then you are not looking at value.
there are 2 franchise qbs sitting here. pick 2 is worth its weight in gold.

a heck of a lot more than a 2nd round pick along. try that second plus next year #1.

you don't give someone rg3 for just a 2nd.

**I see the site has that extra #1 next year and that is what it would take minimum.
***Shane, you may want to drop Dre a bit. Light drug issues invariably cost you 7-10 spots in a draft.
 
Risen Star;4389246 said:
Then you're shortchanging yourself. If teams truly covet RGIII, you can get more for that pick than a 2nd round draft choice.

Commenting on the fact they would certainly be open to a trade. NOT commenting on how much value they may or may not receive in exchange. It is a one round mock.

jterrell;4389256 said:
then you are not looking at value.
there are 2 franchise qbs sitting here. pick 2 is worth its weight in gold.

a heck of a lot more than a 2nd round pick along. try that second plus next year #1.

you don't give someone rg3 for just a 2nd.

**I see the site has that extra #1 next year and that is what it would take minimum.
***Shane, you may want to drop Dre a bit. Light drug issues invariably cost you 7-10 spots in a draft.

Once again. The comment was regarding the likelihood that they would accept a trade down offer. Value is relative and the "chart" is not a rule, it is a guide.

I didn't bother to look at the value chart to decide if they would get adequate value per the chart, only that they would be open to the swap. Dropping down four spots for a high second rounder and still get their guy- isn't out of the question at all.

Is that the only offer on the table? Who knows, who cares, it was what he listed on his mock and trade value or not- if the Rams still get their man, wouldn't be surprised that they pull the trigger and cheer about it.

Who knows, maybe the Commanders include Rex Grossman to boot... best QB in the NFCE after all. Whoo-hoo... fans in Saint Louis go CRAZY! :)
 
JoeCorrado;4389285 said:
Commenting on the fact they would certainly be open to a trade. NOT commenting on how much value they may or may not receive in exchange. It is a one round mock.

Then your initial response to me made no sense whatsoever.

I'm not buying that the Rams move out of 2 to 6 for a 2nd round pick and then draft a RT only candidate to boot.

I never said a thing about the Rams' willingness to trade. I objected to the trade proposed here.
 
Risen Star;4389306 said:
Then your initial response to me made no sense whatsoever.

I'm not buying that the Rams move out of 2 to 6 for a 2nd round pick and then draft a RT only candidate to boot.

I never said a thing about the Rams' willingness to trade. I objected to the trade proposed here.


The website says that the Commanders would be giving up a 2013 first round pick as well.
 
neosapien23;4389309 said:
The website says that the Commanders would be giving up a 2013 first round pick as well.

Was that changed? I don't know how I would miss that.

If that's the new trade, sounds reasonable. But I still don't like the pick at 6.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,003
Messages
14,505,684
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top