Stanford Safety Ed Reynolds 3 or 4th rd.

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
has the prototypical size for a free safety. At 6'2'' and 206 lbs, he is physical enough to be a consistent contributor in the running game, while maintaining the fluidity and agility to cover tight ends and fortify the back-end of the defense. CBS projects him to run a 4.54 40-yard dash, but regardless of what he does at the Combine, Reynolds has shown that he has playmaking speed––he returned 3 INT for TD in 2012, amassing 301 return yards in the process to lead all NCAA players in the country.
Positives:

In many ways, Reynolds looks like an NFL free safety. He is a centerfielder, reading the quarterback's eyes and displaying great range to make plays form sideline to sideline. He is also a big hitter––maybe not as ferocious as Calvin Pryor, but nevertheless a force––and makes receivers pay over the middle. He displays great instincts to find the ball, and great fluidity to make plays on it. As mentioned before, he knows what to do with the football once he gets it, as he returned 3 interceptions for TD and could have had one more (he was ruled down at the 1 yard line). He can stay with even the best tight ends in the slot––helping to hold Washington's Austin Sefarian-Jenkins to 6 catches and 68 yards over 2 games in 2012 and 2013––and provides good protection over the top. He is a smart kid (perhaps a testament to his Stanford education), and really understands his role in the defense as well as the roles of his teammates in the secondary. His angles of pursuit in pass-protection are usually solid, and he is rarely caught out of position. He is physical in run support (although inconsistently), and is a reliable tackler in most situations. Something that cannot be overstated is his experience against top talent, as Stanford played some of the top schools in the country during Edwards' years there. Although this isn't really a "positive", Reynolds comes from a strong football background; his father (who goes by the same name) played linebacker for the Giants and Patriots in the 1980's and was a league office executive after his retirement.

Negatives:

Ed Reynolds has shown a slight tendency to be over-aggressive, sometimes going for the big hit in lieu of the smart tackle. This has been exploited by shifty runners, including UCLA product and current Green Bay Packer Johnathan Franklin, who ran for 194 yards and 2 TD against Standford in 2012. While such performances can often be pegged on Stanford's front-7, the game-tape reveals that Reynolds struggled to contain Franklin and let him go for extra yardage on numerous occasions. Going for the big hit has also led to a few penalties, including a game against Arizona State in which Reynolds was ejected for this questionable quarterback hurry.
Truth told, I don't mind my safeties being a little overaggressive. That is a valuable trait that can be nurtured into a weapon with the right coaching. I am more concerned by his inconsistent open-field tackling. While he was often very solid in this aspect, there were a few instances on film that stood out as red flags, particularly against UCLA in 2012. He has the tools to be an all-around safety (rather than just a centerfielder), but he will need to improve his consistency to achieve his potential. Reynolds also comes with some injury concerns, as an ACL/MCL tear caused him to miss the 2011 season (although he has obviously bounced back well in 2012 and 2013).

http://www.ganggreennation.com/2014/1/20/5324968/scouting-the-draft-ed-reynolds-fs-stanford
 

Doomsday101

Well-Known Member
Messages
107,762
Reaction score
39,034
I have been looking at game tapes of many of the safeties and this kid caught my eye. I think he has the size and good speed should Dallas want a safety in the later rounds. I love the aggressiveness of this kid and 3 TD returns off int is not bad either.
 

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
Another guy that would probably make a better Strong Safety than a Free Safety, but I wouldn't be upset with him as a pick.

He'll probably go in the 2nd or early 3rd, though. There aren't a ton of great safeties in the draft, so they're going to go off the board early, is my guess.
 
Top