THEHEREAFTER
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,862
- Reaction score
- 6,301
Yeah, because Romo's never lost a playoff game to the Giants.
That's not going to happen.
Yeah, because Romo's never lost a playoff game to the Giants.
That's not going to happen.
If Romo doesn't see the field in the playoffs, the Cowboys have no chance to get to the Super Bowl.
Period.
I'm not making excuses. I'm telling you how it was and what is known. Aaron Rodgers was in a funk, Aaron Rodgers was missing wide open reads and throws. He is no longer, and if he throws for 400 yards and 3 TD's like he just did, there is nothing we can do about it.
Because of all the rings on Romos fingersYou know this how?
Romos got the experience this would be an interesting move. No shame in letting the vet take them out for you
Romo sees the game like an elite veteran professional QB. Dak, for now, sees the game like a senior at Mississippi State. He happens to have the best personnel in football, and he's poised, so it's worked well so far.What evidence do you have that Romo DOES give us a chance to reach the SB? While I do understand the allure of Romo, I actually have more confidence and trust to win with Dak based on all the evidence that I can possibly gather over the last decade including this season.
Romo is 5-0 against the Giants lately.The giants own Romo in win or go home games
The definition of INSANITY is repeating the same thing and expecting different results. The Giants have beat us like a drum with their defense. Sooo . . . lets try something different that they have not schemed for. Romo would be a good one along with McFad and Zeke in the back field at the same time.Yeah, because Romo's never lost a playoff game to the Giants.
That's not going to happen.
We beat the giants twice in 07 and they beat us in the playoffsThe definition of INSANITY is repeating the same thing and expecting different results. The Giants have beat us like a drum with their defense. Sooo . . . lets try something different that they have not schemed for. Romo would be a good one along with McFad and Zeke in the back field at the same time.
And how many hits will Tony take playing against that Giants defense? If Dak can't escape it, I don't see how Tony does.Okay, I'll defend the OP's position. When we played the Giants (and Vikings), what I saw was a DL that maintained discipline in their rush and forced Dak to stay in the pocket with no escape lanes. They played tight coverage on the back end and Dak was unwilling or unable to throw into those small windows. Against pretty much everyone else, Dak could escape the pocket when necessary and find an open man or make plays with his legs. Maybe they can fix it with designed rollouts, etc., this time. But if I'm put in a position where I need the QB to throw aggressively and accurately into small windows, Tony's my best bet at this particular moment in time. Now we'd probably trade more offense generated for a turnover or two, but on balance, one can imagine how Tony could be a better option against the Giants and only the Giants.
No worries. Tony won't be playing.And how many hits will Tony take playing against that Giants defense? If Dak can't escape it, I don't see how Tony does.
Prescott led the club to a 13-2 season. He is the undisputed starting QB. End of story. He plays to the end. Its his team now.The definition of INSANITY is repeating the same thing and expecting different results. I agree. 2 playoff wins in 10 years. Time to start Dak.