FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
- Messages
- 36,995
- Reaction score
- 28,207
They have not cut Brent.
I think you mean Josh Brent.FuzzyLumpkins;5014923 said:They have not cut Brent Price.
speedkilz88;5014929 said:I think you mean Josh Brent.
supercowboy8;5014937 said:Who said Spencer will be a DE, I wouldn't be surprised to see him a SOLB in the 4-3
FuzzyLumpkins;5014932 said:Current depth chart
SLB: Albright, Wilber, Spencer
SDE: Spencer, Crawford, Hatcher
NT: Ratliff, Brent, Lissemore
3T: Hatcher, Ratliff, Lissemore
WDE: Ware, Spencer, Wilber
This is what I am getting at in terms of flex.
Despite the moral outrage I like keeping Brent.
gimmesix;5014941 said:Well, they did franchise him as a linebacker, but I don't see it. His best fit in this scheme is DE.
I don't think so.supercowboy8;5014937 said:Who said Spencer will be a DE, I wouldn't be surprised to see him a SOLB in the 4-3
xwalker;5014961 said:I "think" that the Franchise tag is always based on the position from the previous year.
I think Brent fits in well at the 1 at least on run downs. He may have to go on some non injury list given his situation.gimmesix;5014944 said:That's probably fairly accurate, except I don't see Brent ahead of Lissemore. This scheme relies on the quickness of its linemen, and Lissemore has more than Brent.
If Crawford is viewed as a strongside end, I could see keeping Brent. If not, I think we'll end up adding depth at DE and cutting Brent.
GimmeTheBall!;5015020 said:Ratliff and Hatcher are mediocre players. You could almost consider them journeymen. They have played good enough for us to anoint them as icons but not good enough to start for most rational teams.
