Steelers - 29 VS Jags - 31 ***Game Thread****

llutherr;1881063 said:
Bob Sanders?
He's not the greatest Safety to ever play the game, just the Defensive Player of the Year in 2007 despite a mediocre season.

windward;1881079 said:
Darren Sharper plays for the Steelers? :eek:
He's a ball hawk, not the greatest Safety in the History of the NFL either.
 
Roethlisberger has looked horrible, but Garrard is looking like a poser tonight as well.
 
Hostile;1881102 said:
He's not the greatest Safety to ever play the game, just the Defensive Player of the Year in 2007 despite a mediocre season.

Hey, I don't think greatest safety to play the game is playing today, or this year. The annual press wants to elect a few each year though.
 
LMAO at the Steelers LB trying to jump Garrard as he was standing up.
 
kingwhicker;1881203 said:
Party like a rock star boys! Well, I better not get ahead of myself. Keep it up Jags!
I suppose you're enjoying yourself today. ;)
 
If there's one problem I have with Jacksonville, its that they dont know how to put teams away. They had the same problem with Pittsburgh last time and even tho they have a double digit lead, here we go again. Even if they go to NE, I'll have a hard time picking them for this very reason.
 
The Panch;1881250 said:
If there's one problem I have with Jacksonville, its that they dont know how to put teams away. They had the same problem with Pittsburgh last time and even tho they have a double digit lead, here we go again.

Yeah, they do seem to have that problem. That was inexcusable.
 
kingwhicker;1881256 said:
Yeah, they do seem to have that problem. That was inexcusable.
That's probably my main reason why I dont think they can beat NE if they have the lead regardless, cause NE would be their kryptonite in that matter.
 
The Panch;1881264 said:
That's probably my main reason why I dont think they can beat NE if they have the lead regardless, cause NE would be their kryptonite in that matter.

I just hope they hold on to this one. I'll worry about that one later.
 
Here we go. That was a dumb move by Garrard. Holding the ball and staying in the same spot in the pocket that long and taking the sack when he can see the defender right in front of him.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,098
Messages
13,788,605
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top