Stephen Jones - We've got several things that we're considering right now

A legit pass rusher that has proven get home skill and a left tackle thats above average and not a turnstile.
Sounds like Maxx Crosby and Taylor Decker.

Because being able to actually sack the opposing QB, not just pressure him AND being able to consistently protect your own QBs blindside determine wins and losses.

Sign those 2 and I'm all in.
Meh on Decker. All in on Crosby -- I live in Raider territory, so I see most of the games. He is a menace. Absolutely the heart and soul of any defense he plays on. Seems to own a home in every opponent's backfield.
 
Get another edge rusher and be done with it. Defense will be good enough with one more productive edge
To get one you have to get rid of one

Teams are always considering...that means nothing. Let me know when they make a move that helps them win in 2026
Post of the day

A legit pass rusher that has proven get home skill and a left tackle thats above average and not a turnstile.
Sounds like Maxx Crosby and Taylor Decker.

Because being able to actually sack the opposing QB, not just pressure him AND being able to consistently protect your own QBs blindside determine wins and losses.

Sign those 2 and I'm all in.
I love this post especially about actually taking the QB down, how many times are we ALMOST close but don't bring the qb down
 
I love this post especially about actually taking the QB down, how many times are we ALMOST close but don't bring the qb down
Yeah, the infamous Pressures Crowd always make me chuckle when they attempt to downplay the impact of an actual sack.
Usually I add those to a lengthy ig list.
 
Meh on Decker. All in on Crosby -- I live in Raider territory, so I see most of the games. He is a menace. Absolutely the heart and soul of any defense he plays on. Seems to own a home in every opponent's backfield.
Agreed on Crosby. I'm not worried about the knee. It may be something that causes him problems down the road, but I haven't seen anything that says that it is a problem now and he's not been a player to miss a lot of time with injuries. That kind of pass rusher could put us over the top on defense. Trading for him would be expensive, of course, and the Raiders may not even be interested now, but this is the type of deal I expect a team to try to make if it is really intent on going for it.
 
Yeah, the infamous Pressures Crowd always make me chuckle when they attempt to downplay the impact of an actual sack.
Usually I add those to a lengthy ig list.
WHY WEREN'T YOU THERE for me the other day!! Man I got chewed out about this by someone lol it's so funny! WHAT GOOD IS A PRESSURE if the QB is able to step up in the pocket and still make a positive play either running up or making a pass play!

It's crazy how they think, if you're pressuring the QB make him throw it away, to the ground, or sack him! The way they do Dak lol
 
Brooks just signed a brand new 51m contract last week I think.
Crosby has a bum knee and probably will need microfracture surgery before the end of the season!
He did. Brauduss seemed to think he could still be traded
 
WHY WEREN'T YOU THERE for me the other day!! Man I got chewed out about this by someone lol it's so funny! WHAT GOOD IS A PRESSURE if the QB is able to step up in the pocket and still make a positive play either running up or making a pass play!

It's crazy how they think, if you're pressuring the QB make him throw it away, to the ground, or sack him! The way they do Dak lol
Yeah sorry, and you're spot on. 90s Thunderpimp and I had a great discussion on this last year after the Green Bay game in which Micah beat Traits Guyton at the snap countless times BUT was like a nano second from getting home all game long based off how Dak and Schott had specifically gameplanned for Micah. I never seen Dak get rid of the ball so quickly AND with positive results.

Its when Thunderpimp and I said the stat category of pressures should probably not be a stat at all based on IF the play succeeded in spite of a pressure.
So the pressure was irrelevant.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, the infamous Pressures Crowd always make me chuckle when they attempt to downplay the impact of an actual sack.
Usually I add those to a lengthy ig list.
seems the opposite really. nobodies downplaying sacks, they’re just also recognizing pressures which YOURE downplaying.

imagine there are two baseball players. one guy hits 50 homers, he other hits 30, but another 50 to the warning track or off the wall.

both are clearly power hitters, but you shouldn’t / wouldn’t be surprised when player twos hr’s take a leap because the evidence was there
 
seems the opposite really. nobodies downplaying sacks, they’re just also recognizing pressures which YOURE downplaying.

imagine there are two baseball players. one guy hits 50 homers, he other hits 30, but another 50 to the warning track or off the wall.

both are clearly power hitters, but you shouldn’t / wouldn’t be surprised when player twos hr’s take a leap because the evidence was there
Refer to post #31.
More specifically then:
The outcome is the caveat to this discussion.

A pressure should not be credited as any positive stat to an individual player if the play's outcome still netted positive yards.

Since the pressure had no negative effect on the play's outcome it should not be given as a positive pressure to an individual player.
Case closed.
 
Refer to post #31.
More specifically then:
The outcome is the caveat to this discussion.

A pressure should not be credited as any positive stat to an individual player if the play's outcome still netted positive yards.

Since the pressure had no negative effect on the play's outcome it should not be given as a positive pressure to an individual player.
Case closed.
And the counter is IF
the pressure directly led to a throw away, loss yardage, fumble/int. then it could be categorized as a credible pressure.

The problem is the stats don't take it this far.

jmo
 
Refer to post #31.
More specifically then:
The outcome is the caveat to this discussion.

A pressure should not be credited as any positive stat to an individual player if the play's outcome still netted positive yards.

Since the pressure had no negative effect on the play's outcome it should not be given as a positive pressure to an individual player.
Case closed.
yeah of course not, which no one would ever claim so it’s silly to state.

the point is that guys who generally if pressures are more often than not plus players
 
Agreed on Crosby. I'm not worried about the knee. It may be something that causes him problems down the road, but I haven't seen anything that says that it is a problem now and he's not been a player to miss a lot of time with injuries. That kind of pass rusher could put us over the top on defense. Trading for him would be expensive, of course, and the Raiders may not even be interested now, but this is the type of deal I expect a team to try to make if it is really intent on going for it.
Knee thing was stupid. He needed to get scoped. Most players have that surgery multiple times.

Price might be lower now after the failed trade.
 
It does look like they will make a move. The question is will it help them win.
They said this before and it never happened. We have no idea. And there is nothing showing that it looks that way.

If anything the trades may be trading away a few players.
Bell, Schoonmaker, heck even Mingo or Liafau.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,529
Messages
14,543,250
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top