Still dont want Earl?

I still do.
And even with this win I think Seattle should have taken our 2nd rounder, it'll probably be pretty good.
 
The issue is the FO and coaching staff. Not sure a great safety matters.
 
...you don't need to trade for him, people. He'll be a FA next year, he loves the Cowboys, give him the contract he deserves and he'll make an immediate impact on this defense.

He's more valuable than an RB or a WR.
 
If you just watched that game you see how bad our safeties are...

Do you REALLY not want Earl still?
if I thought our offense was good enough to get it done in the playoffs, I would. But since I dont think our offense is very good.... nah. Dont want to have to give him a big contract.
 
Nope.......even without trading a pick....his price as a FA will be way overpriced and past the halfway mark of his career.
 
Nope.......even without trading a pick....his price as a FA will be way overpriced and past the halfway mark of his career.
Earl got two picks in ONE game against us...

Our whole team has zero for the year....

Come on man
 
Earl got two picks in ONE game against us...

Our whole team has zero for the year....

Come on man
From a fans perspective he would be alot of help for 2 maybe 3 years....we would be basically paying a huge contract for what he's already accomplished, not so much what he has left in the take.......all in all it would be a bad business decision.
 
Earl got two picks in ONE game against us...

Our whole team has zero for the year....

Come on man

I don't mind us SIGNING Earl, but, in light of the injury, I don't want to trade picks for him. Maybe we could trade a very low rate player and put him on our injured reserve. THAT would be fine by me.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,465
Messages
13,876,893
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top