http://sportsday.***BANNED-URL***/d.../08/17/sturm-talk-stat-matters-rushing-passer
So basically
Kind of depressing to read, but it's true. Wish we had the will and $ to get some REAL help.
- The Cowboys suck at sacking the qb in both raw sack numbers and sack rates
- Our best sack rate year was w Hardy
- We probably will never be an elite sack team because we don't want to depend the money
- The avg is one sack per 14 pass plays and the Rams pulled 42 pass plays w 1 sack on us
- We where above the NFL avg when we had Ware in 2011
Which would you rather have in a game......?
A defensive end that gets 1 sack and 5 pressures?
or
A defensive end that gets 0 sacks and 12 pressures?
Where are you going to spend the CAP $$$$.
There's only so much to go around.
If you over do it - CAP hell.
I will say this. As an example.
Seattle with Russell Wilson in the early years were defensive monsters as they did not overpay at one position QB.
Now with his expanded CAP hit you see they can't pay everyone and have lost a lot of their top flight talent.
So all teams are stuck on the same playing field.
Top talent commands the CAP $$$$.
You have a short window when your top talent is not taking a large percentage of the CAP for the team.
The QB position, all QB's on roster and part of the 51 players considered as CAP players, are about 15 to 20% of a teams CAP hit.
So what is left you try to move about as best you can.
Impossible to say. What if that sack leads to a fumble that turns into a TD? What if the pressures result in little resistance to the QB completing a fair share of passes?
You asked an impossible question.
Sacks can be vastly overrated. I remember watching Ware get an early sack, then getting pushed around for three quarters, then picking up a late sack in garbage time. Too often. It looked like a great game, when it really wasn't.
Another good example is Eli Manning. He gets rid of the ball so quickly, it can be hard to sack him, but if you get in his face, he'll give up the goose in interceptions. The sack total might be zero, but the pressures created a world of trouble.
Williams and freeney would have been great additions at reasonable rates. Sometimes you just gotta get more talented players via free agency. Alot of peeps think that Mawoya is the answer, but I don't think so. He's bounced around for a reason, and the Raiders didn't feel it was necessary to match our smallish contract offer.The argument against signing DEs in free agency was this story that you couldn't tie up cap space and hurt yourself long term when it came to resigning guys like Frederick, Martin, etc.
And I get that if you are talking about dropping $65MM or whatever god awful number Vernon got.
But I can say with 100% certainty that if the Cowboys had signed Mario Williams to the deal he signed with Miami, and then grabbed Freeney, on the deal he signed with Atlanta, I'd feel much better about our DE situation AND the worst case scenario is that in a year, Freeney would be out of here anyway and you could cut Williams for only $2MM in dead money. A bargain IMO.
Last year we carried 6 DEs to open the season. Wouldn't you feel a bit better about our DE situation if your rotation at DE by mid-season was Lawrence, Freeney, Williams, Gregory, Irving and say Mawoya?
How about........ A defensive end that gets 0 sacks and 12 pressures,3 batted balls,5 knockdowns,7 tackles !!Which would you rather have in a game......?
A defensive end that gets 1 sack and 5 pressures?
or
A defensive end that gets 0 sacks and 12 pressures?