Suishams fg was good

juck

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,246
Reaction score
244
I rewinded it many times it was directly over the pole and good.
 

Tio

Armchair QB
Messages
5,344
Reaction score
339
thats what i thought when it actually happened...
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The refs stand below the uprights for a reason. Your argument is futile.

Besides, at 30 yards, it shouldn't even have been close.
 

gmb85

Active Member
Messages
1,494
Reaction score
8
I thought it was good too. It wouldn't surprise me considering the refs.
 

Kangaroo

Active Member
Messages
9,893
Reaction score
1
juck;3196922 said:
I rewinded it many times it was directly over the pole and good.

When I saw the replay it look good to me but I do not have it recorded so could not be 100% sure.

While that is good to know I guess
 

Gadfly22

Active Member
Messages
692
Reaction score
222
But.....if it was DIRECTLY over the pole, doesn't that mean it would have hit the upright and been not good, as called?

Actually, the replay looked good to me too, but the refs have the better angle, so I have to defer to them (though that's about the worst crew in the NFL).
 

Nethers

New Member
Messages
18
Reaction score
1
i have also watched it over several times today and each time i have i've thought that the kid was good.. just one of those things i guess - we got everything else yesterday
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,683
Reaction score
12,392
nyc;3196941 said:
The refs stand below the uprights for a reason. Your argument is futile.

Besides, at 30 yards, it shouldn't even have been close.

seriously, you can't see the angle correctly on TV unless you get a replay from under the upright.
 

skicat1898

Member
Messages
281
Reaction score
2
Directly over means no good,,, must be inside the goal post.

Ref's angle is far better than TV angle, TV angle can be very misleading.
 

AbeBeta

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,683
Reaction score
12,392
skicat1898;3196986 said:
Directly over means no good,,, must be inside the goal post.

Ref's angle is far better than TV angle, TV angle can be very misleading.

don't bother. refs suck. hate the Cowboys. That's all these folks understand here.
 

anava

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,089
Reaction score
816
Don't think it was good but that's why you win like we did so it doesn't matter
 

superpunk

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,330
Reaction score
75
AbeBeta;3196989 said:
don't bother. refs suck. hate the Cowboys. That's all these folks understand here.

I love the smell of message board fan elitism in the morning.
 

alancdc

Active Member
Messages
3,295
Reaction score
5
juck;3196922 said:
I rewinded it many times it was directly over the pole and good.

I thought if it was directly over the pole it is considered no good as the pole extends up it would have hit it/ Jsut curious??
 

TellerMorrow34

BraveHeartFan
Messages
28,358
Reaction score
5,076
It looked like he just missed it to me and frankly from 30 yards it shouldn't have been that close a call in the first place.
 

YosemiteSam

Unfriendly and Aloof!
Messages
45,858
Reaction score
22,189
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
superpunk;3197022 said:
I love the smell of message board fan elitism in the morning.

Wait till you get a load of me.

Jack%20nicholson.jpg


:laugh2:
 

casmith07

Attorney-at-Zone
Messages
31,538
Reaction score
9,312
nyc;3196941 said:
The refs stand below the uprights for a reason. Your argument is futile.

Besides, at 30 yards, it shouldn't even have been close.

This.
 
Top