Superbowl in London???

Jed_70;3466193 said:
This is just another case of Goodell trying to fix something that's not broken.

American football does not have a global appeal and the NFL is largely responsible for that. Their thing has always been to market the team/league and not the individual.

The average UK citizen probably doesn't give a damn about the average NFL team. They may know of the elite franchises like Dallas, NE, and Pittsburgh; but I doubt they know what an Atlanta Falcon is; and I doubt they could name a single Falcon player.

I look at it like this. The reason the NBA was able to expand globally is because for they longest they've stressed marketing the individual. Plus they were able to put their product on the world stage beginning in the 1992 Olympics.

Unfortunately for Goodell, there is no world stage for his product. He can send a team to London but I seriously doubt league popularity skyrockets across Europe simply because the NFL jettisons some struggling franchise, like the Jaguars, across the pond.

There will be the initial surge and hype, akin to teams that open new stadiums, but once the games start and that new car smell wears off, the fans will lose interest and the franchise will start hemorrhaging money. Then in roughly 6-9 years the team will be relocated back stateside.

IMO, you have to sell the individual when you're breaking into a new market. The NBA sold the best they had to offer; Jordan, Magic, Barkely, etc. To somewhat borrow a phrase from Seinfeld, basically the NFL is trying to market laundry. The only time that works is if an elite franchise is involved and that goes back to the Lakers, Yankees, and Cowboys of the world.

They could round up 22 of us, throw us in some Cowboy gear and sell us to the Brits and they'd lap it up because they're getting to see "The Dallas Cowboys". One of America's premier sports teams.

And I bet the 22 of us dressed in Cowboys gear would outdraw the real San Diego Chargers. The Chargers are a good team. They win 11 or 12 games every year, and have Pro Bowlers up and down the roster. But this is the NFL. And the NFL chose to market the laundry rather than the individual. So the average yahoo from London will be more willing to fork over their hard earned money to come watch me, BrainPaint, DCFanatic, Chocolate Lab, and others, than to watch Rivers, Jackson, Merriman, Castillo, and co.
:bow: well said sir. I always wondered too will the NFL help flip the bill for flying a team and their staff to london. Its one thing to fly in the US but to fly your team and staff across the altlantic I couldnt imagine what the cost would be for something like that
 
It is a terrible idea to have a superbowl in london (if it were to happen I predict MASS boycotts by fans).

It is an even worse idea to have a team in london, the travel, timing and logistics would be an absolute nightmare.

It would be one thing if these ideas (and other stupid but not so obvious ideas) were actually just ideas being tossed around for the betterment of the game, and goodell thought it would help the quality of the game. But, IMO, I think he (and many of the owners) know that they are bad ideas but are still willing to throw them out there because of their greed.

The chance to make some money, to them, is worth making the game and product weaker. It seems its been this way for a while now, but maybe when I was younger I just did not notice it as much.
 
I don't have much of a problem with this. Most fans that go to watch their team in a Super Bowl are going to have a long trip in store anyway. Is it
that much different going to LA or Miami than going to London? Not unless your in those areas.

The only downside I see from a fan perspective is that demand in London for tickets would be much higher than in your average US based game. That would make the the prices even higher for anyone that wanted to buy a ticket and keep some people from going who otherwise might. Can't imagine any company, much less the NFL, balking on an idea because there's too much demand for their product.
 
casmith07;3466093 said:
Mexico City would go absolutely bananas if they got an NFL franchise. But with the way Juarez is right now, I wouldn't sniff close to mainland Mexico for anything, haha.

The problem is that no players would go there, just like the old Montreal Expos. Who wants to live and play in Mexico City? And would the players be paid in pesos??
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,568
Messages
14,545,958
Members
24,212
Latest member
JerryJonesSupporter
Back
Top