Yeah cuz if the Lions had any kind of passing game, they would of killed us.dude they kept that qb at 200 yards, got 3 sacks, didnt give up to many 30+ plays we won. lets move on to new england please.
No actually if stafford played in that game, we'd have 10 sacks.Yeah cuz if the Lions had any kind of passing game, they would of killed us.
LolNo actually if stafford played in that game, we'd have 10 sacks.
Different line different quarterback different game. But I do believe we will get 3+ sacks and/or a lot of pressures. And I dont think anyone can deny that he(Drieskel) is 10x faster than stafford and we would of got more sacks.Lol
guess we will find out next week against an offense that is struggling and a QB that can't run
We’ve moved on for 23 plus years. Some of us like pointing out the obvious. We quit drinking the koolaid years ago. Just moving on hasn’t worked out so well. We can’t do anything but try to embarrass JJ at this point by all means necessary.dude they kept that qb at 200 yards, got 3 sacks, didnt give up to many 30+ plays we won. lets move on to new england please.
yeah that is due to they won the game.At the risk of stating the obvious, that was a blow-out, of course, if not for the fact that the defense couldn't get off the field against a back-up QB and a pisspoor running game.
I don't want to be depressed the whole week! Gotta hope for the best - that Dak and the WRs can carry us.At the risk of stating the obvious, that was a blow-out, of course, if not for the fact that the defense couldn't get off the field against a back-up QB and a pisspoor running game.