Tanier: Expensive QB Mistakes

JD_KaPow

jimnabby
Messages
11,072
Reaction score
10,836
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
A little bit on Romo at the end, some about Flacco, but mostly just a good article about teams suffering because of bad QB contracts.

The takeaway: never stop drafting QBs.

http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...ack-mistakes-in-the-nfl-and-how-to-avoid-them

Excerpt:

So the Texans have buyer's remorse. The Bears have wasted several years. The Jets went from the toast of the Big Apple back to the gutter in a few months. The Ravens are unsweetened oatmeal.

But quarterbacks are gonna get paid, and paid a lot. Even the second-tier ones are destined for hefty deals. How does a team avoid an expensive setback at a position of high scarcity and absolute necessity?

Shorter contracts are a step in the right direction. Russell Wilson's contract is unlikely to cause anyone regrets because it comes to a hard stop in 2019; Luck's deal is also shorter and more front-loaded than those old Cutler-Flacco gut busters. Avoiding cap-credit shenanigans is also key: Extending a quarterback's contract to free cap space is no different than using one credit card to pay off another.

But most important, teams need to draft real quarterback prospects, even when they don't think they need them, and keep the development pipeline open at all times.

You may have noticed that the most expensive quarterback mistake of all is not on this list. Tony Romo's contract is practically a masterpiece of accounting science fiction after years of cap-management tomfoolery. If Romo had played this year, the Cowboys (like the Texans and Ravens) would probably be OK, though with a lingering sense they were falling short of their potential and facing down $70 million in unpaid bills.

Thanks to Dak Prescott, however, the Cowboys are the feel-good story of the year, with Romo retreating gracefully to the bench and his $20 million (yes, $20 million) in looming dead-money cap charges looking more like a major inconvenience than financial Armageddon.
 

sean10mm

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
3,000
If the Cowboys cut or trade Romo in 2017 they are perfectly OK financially. 2016 was the "wasted" year when he cost a lot of money, didn't play and couldn't be traded without losing cap space they didn't have. The period of "financial danger" from his contract is already past, and of course 2016 has been going just fine.

If Romo is a June 1st cut in 2017, the Cowboys go from almost 10m over the cap to 4m under the cap. They're not trapped by his contract at all. It's actually kind of perfect.
 

sean10mm

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
3,000
The funny thing about Cutler is that his play has basically been exactly the same since his time in Denver. He's always been a big arm attached to a small, lazy brain with a garbage personality. Yet every year people are surprised he's the same guy throwing stupid picks and acting like he doesn't give a crap.
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,988
Reaction score
48,735
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
The funny thing about Cutler is that his play has basically been exactly the same since his time in Denver. He's always been a big arm attached to a small, lazy brain with a garbage personality. Yet every year people are surprised he's the same guy throwing stupid picks and acting like he doesn't give a crap.
Cutler probably has one the highest IQs in the NFL. Which makes it all the more baffling at times.
He is way to confident in his arm talent.

You see guys like Stafford and even Romo evolve over time. Jay still seems to be Jay.:laugh:
 
Top