Cowboy Junkie
leonargized
- Messages
- 2,512
- Reaction score
- 1
The Bears defense has been poor his year , how much of impact did Tank have on this?????
cobra;1735128 said:theogt: I'm not going to argue with you because I respect your analysis a lot of the time, and you really know your college/combine info.
I'll concede that Tank is probably an extremely physically gifted player.
I just didn't see that translate much onto the field when I watched Chicago last year, so I am trying to temper my enthusiasm.
I get the feeling that our fanbase is thinking we just got a Pro Bowl DT stud, and I don't think Tank is that. Now I'd be doing backflips if it was Tommie Harris we were getting. Harris was the dominant player on that Bears line. Harris was the one that demanded double teams. Harris was the stud.
I think Tank is a very good complimentary player. I don't think he is a stud in his own right.
But we will see. I was just trying to give some guidance and my impression that we are getting a nice player, but not a dominant one. In other words, to the extent something is wrong with our DL, I don't expect Tank to be the kind of player who turns it all around. He might be a little better than Ratliff, but I wouldn't expect much more. Maybe I'll be pleasantly surprised.
Cowboy Junkie;1735142 said:The Bears defense has been poor his year , how much of impact did Tank have on this?????
TheCount;1735154 said:I think it would be one thing if we ran a 4 - 3 and were getting rid of the weakest link in favor of a good player like tank. But it's not like we've been struggling at NT. So he'll help, but he's not superman.
Chocolate Lab;1735162 said:Look at that vertical and broad jump... It's better than Spencer's even at over 300 lbs.
Of course, what this really means is that Spencer is a bust.
Tank Johnson >>>>> Sam Hurdpeplaw06;1735174 said:Tank will most definitely help the passing game. He's going to be our deep threat to take the focus off of TO. Look at that 40 time.
dallasfaniac;1735221 said:Heck, might as well see if Tank can handle TE/FB duties with that time, especially around the goalline.
cobra;1734941 said:Tank is just good-pretty good. He isn't anything special. He's got a cool name and was in the papers a lot because of his off-the-field stuff. He's pretty atheletic. But he isn't a dominating football player. Tommie Harris--the other Chicago defensive tackle--was the animal that everyone game planned for. This allowed Tank to have a lot of single blockers. He did alright with that.
He isn't going to come in here and revolutionize this defense. Getting Ellis back had far more impact on this team then getting Tank in here.
Tank is about as good as Darwin Walker, the guy that replaced him.
Solid, nothing special.
Star4Ever;1734917 said:He is extremely quick off the ball. However, not playing or practicing (until very recently) since early February will most likely have a negative impact on his quickness, at least until he knocks the rust off. Regardless, he's a talented player that adds much needed depth if nothing else. Personally, I think he will provide a big lift, especially in December and beyond.
So, basically Tank because a starter because he was solid were Scott was strong and was strong were Scott was weak. I will take solid against the run and strong on the pass rush.
Bob Sacamano;1735330 said:but I agree w/ your take that he's good, but nothing special, he'll help alot to improve our 3rd down defense IMO