Tannehill, Mike White or Trevor Siemian are our QB options?

ShiningStar

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,411
Reaction score
7,676
some fans really love their mediocrity.

Hey guys, which sucky QB do you want??!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,212
Reaction score
36,767
If I actually wanted to win games and had a competent team I'd give Tanny a look. He was a good bus driver for awhile.
 

CWR

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,212
Reaction score
36,767
of course jerry could try to sign the Coog. Give him a look see. They say he throws a deep ball that reminds everyone of Darryl LaMonica.

I have a feeling he looks exactly like uncle Rico, mustache and all.
 

Coogiguy03

Well-Known Member
Messages
25,614
Reaction score
21,564
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
of course jerry could try to sign the Coog. Give him a look see. They say he throws a deep ball that reminds everyone of Darryl LaMonica.
If you're going to mention my name, at least TAG me so I see it bud!!! Glad I was reading this and came across it!!! lol
 

JonesBoys

Well-Known Member
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
5,520
Yea, at this point there is no point.
White sucks. He had 1-2 good games in NY, then absolute ***.
Siemian I didn't realize was still playing or wanting to.
Tannehill? Meh. Only Looked competent with a running game. See 2016 Miami and him with D-Henry a few years back'
Watched him his entire career in Miami. Not the savior if he has no run game and has to be "the guy"
So Dak 2.0
 

RonWashington

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,219
Reaction score
8,206
I’m being serious . Mike White has a 400 yard game in the NFL under his belt with the lousy Jets , sign him as QB3 and he’s better than the 2 QB’s today .
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,467
Reaction score
17,856
I’m being serious . Mike White has a 400 yard game in the NFL under his belt with the lousy Jets , sign him as QB3 and he’s better than the 2 QB’s today .
Well now, now that we know how we have no depth, Tannehill definitely deserves a look. Tha is, chaps, assuming we are not tanking.
 

SoBlue128

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,074
Reaction score
5,889
Nope none of the above. The owner traded a 4th round pick for Lance throw him out there and get your money’s worth.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,832
Reaction score
26,533
A fight for what? Anybody they sign is backing up Lance.
I would have rush backing up Lance and sign the cheapest guy I could for emergency QB. This seasons over. Why win a meaningless game or two that cost you a guy that can help from the draft?
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,832
Reaction score
26,533
Well now, now that we know how we have no depth, Tannehill definitely deserves a look. Tha is, chaps, assuming we are not tanking.
What would be the point? Dak is gonna be back next year no matter what and probably the year after. Sign someone cheap and start lance. Hopefully he gets us a top 5 pick
 

charron

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,388
Reaction score
14,796
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
None are better than Rush. This offense struggled with Dak and it will continue to struggle with any of these lesser QB's.
 
Top